You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note that even if the synchronous test API client does not raise any warning when it's not closed, I still updated the template for it so that the behaviour aligns with the async version.
As of the samples, in this PR I updated the asyncio samples only. I did try to update the regular python samples as well, but it seems that most samples are severely outdated, especially for tests because the generator does not overwrite test files if they already exist, though I don't know why there is this rule in the generator, and therefore I would have to update a lot of irrelevant lines along with the core changes in this PR, which does not seem to be a good idea. I'm happy to update the samples in a separate PR.
Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
(For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH)
Commit all changed files.
This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
IMPORTANT: Do NOT purge/delete any folders/files (e.g. tests) when regenerating the samples as manually written tests may be removed.
File the PR against the correct branch: master (upcoming 7.x.0 minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks), 8.0.x (breaking changes without fallbacks)
If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.
Do we want to keep the API client in python and python-pydantic-v1 consistent? Multithreading is still enabled in python-pydantic-v1, which is why the close method works.
Do we want to leverage the skipOverwrite config value to allow overwriting generated test files? This can then be used in generate-samples.sh and we can prevent test files in samples from being outdated again. This should be a one-liner change in DefaultGenerator.java from what I see now.
Do we want to leverage the skipOverwrite config value to allow overwriting generated test files? This can then be used in generate-samples.sh and we can prevent test files in samples from being outdated again. This should be a one-liner change in DefaultGenerator.java from what I see now.
thanks for the suggestion. can you please file a PR to start with?
Sure. Right now there is a comment in the file explicitly saying not to overwrite test files. I'll try to figure out where that change came from and understand the rationale and see it it's appropriate to apply the config value here.
Do we want to keep the API client in python and python-pydantic-v1 consistent? Multithreading is still enabled in python-pydantic-v1, which is why the close method works.
python-pydantic-v1 is deprecated.
some other features and bug fixes made in v2 are not done.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #19998.
Note that even if the synchronous test API client does not raise any warning when it's not closed, I still updated the template for it so that the behaviour aligns with the async version.
As of the samples, in this PR I updated the asyncio samples only. I did try to update the regular python samples as well, but it seems that most samples are severely outdated, especially for tests because the generator does not overwrite test files if they already exist, though I don't know why there is this rule in the generator, and therefore I would have to update a lot of irrelevant lines along with the core changes in this PR, which does not seem to be a good idea. I'm happy to update the samples in a separate PR.
Test
Generated some code locally:
without the warning mentioned in #19998.
PR checklist
Commit all changed files.
This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example
./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.IMPORTANT: Do NOT purge/delete any folders/files (e.g. tests) when regenerating the samples as manually written tests may be removed.
master(upcoming7.x.0minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks),8.0.x(breaking changes without fallbacks)@tomplus Please help review this PR. Thank you!