Skip to content

[18.0][ADD] stock_picking_report_wo_order_qty#498

Open
DantePereyra wants to merge 1 commit into
OCA:18.0from
solvosci:18.0-add-stock_picking_report_wo_order_qty
Open

[18.0][ADD] stock_picking_report_wo_order_qty#498
DantePereyra wants to merge 1 commit into
OCA:18.0from
solvosci:18.0-add-stock_picking_report_wo_order_qty

Conversation

@DantePereyra

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Remove the quantity ordered field from the delivery slip report when the picking is done, as it is not relevant in that case.

BEFORE
imagen
AFTER
imagen

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added series:18.0 mod:stock_picking_report_wo_order_qty Module stock_picking_report_wo_order_qty labels May 19, 2026
Remove the quantity ordered field from the delivery slip report
when the picking is done, as it is not relevant in that case.
@DantePereyra DantePereyra force-pushed the 18.0-add-stock_picking_report_wo_order_qty branch from 7682332 to 7377568 Compare May 19, 2026 10:04

@cgarcia-solvos cgarcia-solvos left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code and Functional review. LGTM!

@IriaAlonso IriaAlonso left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
code and funtional review

@OCA-git-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@BhaveshHeliconia BhaveshHeliconia left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code and functional review LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants