Skip to content

test: trivial families/bert comment as GPU CI live-fire payload (retest) - #1350

Closed
zhenshanx-nv wants to merge 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
zhenshanx-nv:gpu_ci_live_test_2
Closed

zhenshanx-nv wants to merge 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
zhenshanx-nv:gpu_ci_live_test_2

Conversation

@zhenshanx-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Not intended to merge. Retest of closed #1260 to reproduce the Community GPU CI ResourceExhausted / vpc.pool.count quota error. Will close after observation.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: ced655d4-f605-46d2-b5d0-6cf7cdde467f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e48814b and d4dec0b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • families/bert/support.py

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 11 remain after this review.


📝 Summary

Summary

  • Added a comment-only GPU CI live-fire payload to families/bert/support.py.
  • The change does not alter BERT behavior or public declarations.
  • The PR retests the Community GPU CI quota-error path and is not intended to merge.

Architecture impact

  • Family-owned files: families/bert/support.py.
  • Shared surfaces changed: None.
  • New dependency directions: None.
  • Affected consumers: Community GPU CI.
  • Unresolved questions: The supplied evidence does not confirm GPU reservation, build completion, BERT test execution, or commit-status reporting.

Review outcome

PASS — No standards or specification violation was found in the reviewed evidence. This does not prove that the PR is correct.

Test execution results are not available.

Walkthrough

The PR adds a comment to families/bert/support.py. The comment documents a GPU CI quota reproduction payload and a retest for issue #1260. No runtime behavior changes.

Changes

GPU CI test note

Layer / File(s) Summary
GPU CI payload comment
families/bert/support.py
Adds a comment that documents the GPU CI quota reproduction payload and issue #1260 retest.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other · Severity of issue fixed: Low

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to d4dec

The GPU CI retest note does not affect product behavior, so no actionable merge risk remains.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 7 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description states the retest purpose and closure plan, but it omits the required Background, Exit Criteria, Implementation, Validation, Self-Review, Notes, and Risk sections. Complete the repository template. Add the required sections, record exact validation commands and results, document the hardware and environment, list remaining gaps, confirm self-review, select a change category and risk level, and provide…
Linked Issues check ❓ Inconclusive The diff adds the required comment-only change in families/bert/support.py and introduces no behavior change, which matches issue #1260's implementation requirement. The available evidence does not … Provide the Community GPU CI run evidence for this PR, including the GPU reservation, build, BERT family test, and commit-status results.
✅ Passed checks (7 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the comment-only BERT change and its purpose as a GPU CI live-fire retest.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed The whole-PR diff contains only the comment-only change requested by issue #1260 in families/bert/support.py. It does not contain unrelated functional, dependency, or repository changes.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Family Ownership Boundary ✅ Passed PASS: The reviewed range changes only families/bert/support.py. Lines 14-15 add a blank line and a comment. The family_support import and BERT declaration are unchanged from the base revision. No …
Shared Semantic Neutrality ✅ Passed PASS: The authoritative diff changes only families/bert/support.py by adding a comment. The existing family_support declaration is unchanged. families/bert is family-owned model Python, not shar…
Benchmark Validation Integrity ✅ Passed The check is not triggered. The authoritative PR diff changes only families/bert/support.py by adding a comment and a blank line. The family_support declaration and all executable code remain unch…
Shared Change Blast Radius ✅ Passed PASS: The pull request changes only families/bert/support.py by adding a comment. The family_support import and all BERT family declarations remain unchanged. The description identifies the change…
Full details: Description check

Resolution

Complete the repository template. Add the required sections, record exact validation commands and results, document the hardware and environment, list remaining gaps, confirm self-review, select a change category and risk level, and provide the risk rationale. Mark non-applicable fields with a reason.

Full details: Linked Issues check

Explanation

The diff adds the required comment-only change in families/bert/support.py and introduces no behavior change, which matches issue #1260's implementation requirement. The available evidence does not show whether Community GPU CI fired automatically, reserved a GPU, built, ran the BERT family tests, or reported a commit status. Those exit criteria cannot be verified from the source diff.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@zhenshanx-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Reproduction complete: GPU CI passed cleanly, quota issue did not reproduce. Closing per plan.

@zhenshanx-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing: reproduction/testing complete, this PR is not intended to merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant