chore(http): no extended url encoding - #824
Conversation
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remain after this review. Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe URL-encoded body parser now uses ChangesURL-encoded Body Parsing
File-Provisioning Log
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes Change: Bug fix Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The parser change reflects the requested simple-form behavior, and the inspected worker caller uses JSON. The provisioning edit changes only log wording; no concrete merge-blocking behavior risk is established. Security Architecture ReviewSecurity architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The change affects how form submissions are interpreted, but the routes and downstream checks remain in place. Compatibility for external clients that send nested form fields is not established. Retained concerns Security review detailsSecurity Blast Radius
Trust Boundaries and Controls
Hardening Proposals
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Full details: Out of Scope Changes checkExplanation The change in
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. A rabbit checks the parser's setting, Comment |
|



Fixes #823
@MaskingTechnology/jitar