Skip to content

fix(web): enlarge technical entry Markdown fields - #12

Merged
Lucalopezz merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/issue-8-entry-markdown-fields
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

Lucalopezz merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/issue-8-entry-markdown-fields

Conversation

@Lucalopezz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What changed

  • Give Context and Conclusion more room in the entry detail reader and inline editor before internal scrolling starts.
  • Start both creation fields and the close-issue Conclusion field at a taller height. Widen the creation dialog and cap dialog height so short screens can scroll to its actions.
  • Keep short Markdown compact and preserve the existing save, cancel, validation, and scrolling flows.

Why

Long Markdown previously reached a 440px reading/editing cap, and new-entry textareas started at about 126px or less. A 640px cap reduces repeated scrolling for longer notes while retaining a bounded page. The taller dialog fields trade some initial screen space for easier drafting, with dialog scrolling on short viewports.

Validation

  • Playwright: two new layout/scroll tests and the existing narrow-screen Markdown test passed.
  • Vitest: 20 focused technical-entry tests passed.
  • Web lint, build, and e2e TypeScript check passed.

Screenshot

New technical entry dialog with larger Context and Conclusion fields

Closes #8

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
devlog-unified-preview Ready Ready Preview Oct 22, 2026 12:15pm UTC

@Lucalopezz
Lucalopezz merged commit fe42536 into main Oct 22, 2026
5 checks passed
@Lucalopezz
Lucalopezz deleted the fix/issue-8-entry-markdown-fields branch October 23, 2026 09:49

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — 1d6da7f4 Deployed Oct 22, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve TE description and conclusion fields in interface

1 participant