Add utxo codegen + local variables (let)#40
Merged
Conversation
SpaceManiac
changed the title
SpaceManiac
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added tuples just to be able to write
utxo.resume(()).Since otherwise it was kind of weird to have
utxo.resume()work with no data (since it's like a function call, and not syntax).TODO:
Currently
resumeis a bit weird, sincestarstream_resumedoesn't return anything, but in theory it should return the utxo (at least if we actually need utxos to be affine). So currently this only works with a utxo that yields only once.Also yielding and resuming with actual data.