Add RELEASE.md documentation#331
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 52 minutes and 18 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new ChangesRelease Process Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
RELEASE.md (2)
49-54: ⚡ Quick winPoint the bump step at the existing automation.
The repo already provides
yarn versions:bump/node ./scripts/update-backstage.mjs; documenting that command instead of hand-editing bothpackage.jsonfiles would reduce drift and keep the version updates in sync.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@RELEASE.md` around lines 49 - 54, In the "Bump to the Next Development Version" section of RELEASE.md, replace the instruction that tells users to manually update the version field in both plugin package.json files with the `-dev` suffix. Instead, document the use of the existing automation commands (yarn versions:bump or node ./scripts/update-backstage.mjs) to perform the version bump. This ensures version updates remain consistent across both files and reduces the risk of manual errors causing drift.
12-15: ⚡ Quick winDocument the release branch convention explicitly.
This step only mentions
main, but the PR objective calls outrelease-X.Y-style release branches. Please add that flow here so people do not follow the wrong branch model.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@RELEASE.md` around lines 12 - 15, The current instructions in the section describing where to push the commit only mention pushing directly to `main`, but do not document the `release-X.Y` style release branch convention referenced in the PR objectives. Add an explicit bullet point or flow option that describes the release branch model as an alternative to pushing to main, clearly explaining the `release-X.Y` naming convention and when this approach should be used instead of pushing directly to main. This will help users follow the correct branch model for releases.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@RELEASE.md`:
- Around line 45-47: The version example in the manual workflow_dispatch
documentation is misleading because it assumes the base version is `0.0.2`, but
if `plugins/kuadrant/package.json` already contains a dev suffix (like
`0.0.2-dev`), the resulting published version would append the short SHA to that
existing version, resulting in `0.0.2-dev-abc1234` instead of `0.0.2-abc1234`.
Update the example in the RELEASE.md file to clarify that the short Git SHA is
appended to whatever the current `package.json` version is, including any
existing suffixes, to accurately represent the behavior.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@RELEASE.md`:
- Around line 49-54: In the "Bump to the Next Development Version" section of
RELEASE.md, replace the instruction that tells users to manually update the
version field in both plugin package.json files with the `-dev` suffix. Instead,
document the use of the existing automation commands (yarn versions:bump or node
./scripts/update-backstage.mjs) to perform the version bump. This ensures
version updates remain consistent across both files and reduces the risk of
manual errors causing drift.
- Around line 12-15: The current instructions in the section describing where to
push the commit only mention pushing directly to `main`, but do not document the
`release-X.Y` style release branch convention referenced in the PR objectives.
Add an explicit bullet point or flow option that describes the release branch
model as an alternative to pushing to main, clearly explaining the `release-X.Y`
naming convention and when this approach should be used instead of pushing
directly to main. This will help users follow the correct branch model for
releases.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
Signed-off-by: Priyanshu-u07 <connect.priyanshu8271@gmail.com>
08ba35e to
7d5c454
Compare
Adds a
RELEASE.mddocumenting the release process for kuadrant-backstage-plugin.Closes #329
Summary by CodeRabbit