You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Restart triage: P2 — issue-template improvements for this issue (#191). The existing implementation PR #195 explicitly links this issue and adds a bug form, so reviewing that work avoids a duplicate implementation.
Next step: define acceptance fields for package/Python version, OS, reproduction command, expected/actual output and redacted logs. In the related form, correct labels: ["bug, invalid"]: it is one combined label string, and reports should not automatically be marked invalid.
Source/diff review only; the form was not exercised. Keeping this issue and its related PR open.
Activity
github-actions commentedon May 26, 2023
Hi👋 thanks for creating your first issue for IOSF, Will get back to you soon !.
aditya-bagla commentedon May 27, 2023
Hi ,
Aditya Bagla ( GSSOC'23 contributor )
I would like to contribute on this issue . Can you please assign me ?
GouravSardana commentedon Jun 4, 2023
Done @Anshika-Jain02
GouravSardana commentedon Oct 21, 2026
Restart triage: P2 — issue-template improvements for this issue (#191). The existing implementation PR #195 explicitly links this issue and adds a bug form, so reviewing that work avoids a duplicate implementation.
Next step: define acceptance fields for package/Python version, OS, reproduction command, expected/actual output and redacted logs. In the related form, correct
labels: ["bug, invalid"]: it is one combined label string, and reports should not automatically be marked invalid.Source/diff review only; the form was not exercised. Keeping this issue and its related PR open.