whatcable 0.6.0 (new cask)

[unitof]

---

After making any changes to a cask, existing or new, verify:

• The submission is for a stable version or documented exception.
• brew audit --cask --online <cask> is error-free.
• brew style --fix <cask> reports no offenses.

Additionally, if adding a new cask:

• Named the cask according to the token reference.
• Checked the cask was not already refused (add your cask's name to the end of the search field).
• brew audit --cask --new <cask> worked successfully.
• HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --cask <cask> worked successfully.
• brew uninstall --cask <cask> worked successfully.

---

• AI was used to generate or assist with generating this PR. Please specify below how you used AI to help you, and what steps you have taken to manually verify the changes, including zap stanza paths.

---

[unitof]

Audit will fail as GitHub repo is <30 days. I may request exception or just wait it out, but before that:

This Swift app is open source and compiles both a GUI macOS app, and/or a standalone CLI tool (whatcable).

I'd like to offer the option of installing either or both on Homebrew—what's the best approach?

Would it be a whatcable-cli Formula which builds just the CLI app, and this Cask (named whatcable-app?) which installs both?

[bevanjkay]

Is the CLI what is being installed by the binary stanza here? If so, and it's primarily a companion to the app, installing them both with this cask is ok. Is the CLI a separate project?

[unitof]

CLI is included within this codebase, but I could imagine many users (myself included) wanting to install only the CLI, without the GUI app. It compiles and runs independently of the GUI app.