[EvanProgramming]

V3 could lose cancellation/persistence evidence, trust worker-provided execution authority, or let edited benchmark source influence the final oracle. This branch preserves task/result and process identities, keeps actual permissions and single-use tickets in a privileged parent, and executes frozen assertions outside edited source processes. Public downloads remain on published v2.0.8 while V3 is unreleased.

Current signed head: d668c706af21e9ce855265e14d5384d17cce01d7. Not ready to merge or publish: real-provider testing exposed additional native Working Plan failures, now being repaired offline.

Implemented and independently reviewed changes include correlated native feedback for wholly rejected mixed plan/tool batches, separate physical-outcome and workflow verdicts under R221, and an identical explicit existing-file boundary for both benchmark arms. Frozen fixtures, original tests, baseline, model settings, protocol counters, statistical formulas, mandatory V3 planning/context/safety gates and resource thresholds remain unchanged.

Exact-head offline acceptance passed:

• Local1,620tests/28conditional skips; check/lint/docs, architecture, GoTUI, packaging, website and off-checkout wheel/sdist checks. Nine retained artifacts/checksums have detached GPG signatures.
• Six-platform CI: all six actual1,800+s soaks,304 process identity checkpoints, full POSIX suites and explicit Windows support/PTY exceptions.
• Four privileged combinations:174cases/job with documented skips and unchanged Linux host policies.
• R260 independent native mechanism/reliability assessment passed using the original capture and complete bounded decoding of that same ETL. Original XML export timeout and historical failures remain retained; the unique historical trigger remains inferred.
  -13 scoped offline gate records have been signed for d668. This is not a full17-gate manifest or completion of all266 acceptances.

Current d668 paid acceptance passed its original two-request native-tool smoke, then was owner-stopped after7completed cells when actual native plan failures were confirmed. Two inspection cells exhausted51requests without establishing a WorkingPlan; captured invalid-argument receipts show invented new-task IDs, insufficient schema/state guidance and unhelpful branch errors. Another captured cell completed reproduction/patch/original tests but exhausted its turn limit with unresolved task/evidence contracts. Original outcomes, all244 checkpointed calls, any uncheckpointed ledger attempts, usage and unknown holds are retained. A new candidate will require fresh freezing and acceptance; these partial rows will not be pooled.

R259/R262/R263/R264, the fixed fresh180-cell comparison, separate54-cell routing experiment and complete independent semantic/workflow review remain unpassed. Prior stopped9e rows and smoke failures also remain historical. The SAME cumulative CNY15 cap includes all historical/current/smoke/retry/unknown use, with CNY2.032768 reserved before each request; stopped-ledger accounting is being finalized before any further paid run.

Evidence stays outside the checkout. Main will advance only by a non-forced fast-forward to the same fully verified SHA after all17formal gates pass and fresh concurrency/rules checks. No main advance, tag, draft/public Release, package upload or preview-publisher execution has occurred.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: defaults
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 9ee3f7ac-67c2-4cf1-92dd-552d196db984

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-07T11:27:28.703517Z	0109494	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.