Better show for RotatedLatitudeLongitudeGrid and LambertConformalConicGrid

[navidcy]

Before this PR:

julia> grid = RotatedLatitudeLongitudeGrid(; size = (24, 6, 5), latitude = (-90, 90), longitude=(0, 360), z=(-100, 0), north_pole = (0, 0))
24×6×5 OrthogonalSphericalShellGrid{Float64, Periodic, Bounded, Bounded} on CPU with 3×3×3 halo
├── centered at: North Pole, (λ, φ) = (116.565, 90.0)
├── longitude: Periodic  extent 360.0 degrees variably spaced with min(Δλ)=9.18485e-16, max(Δλ)=15.0
├── latitude:  Bounded  extent 180.0 degrees  variably spaced with min(Δφ)=30.0, max(Δφ)=30.0
└── z:         Bounded  z ∈ [-100.0, 0.0]     regularly spaced with Δz=20.0

After this PR

julia> grid = RotatedLatitudeLongitudeGrid(; size = (24, 6, 5), latitude = (-90, 90), longitude=(0, 360), z=(-100, 0), north_pole = (0, 0))
24×6×5 RotatedLatitudeLongitudeGrid{Float64, Periodic, Bounded, Bounded} on CPU with 3×3×3 halo
├── singularities at (λ, φ) = (0, 0) and (180, 0)
├── longitude: Periodic  extent 360.0 degrees variably spaced with min(Δλ)=9.18485e-16, max(Δλ)=15.0
├── latitude:  Bounded  extent 180.0 degrees  variably spaced with min(Δφ)=30.0, max(Δφ)=30.0
└── z:         Bounded  z ∈ [-100.0, 0.0]     regularly spaced with Δz=20.0

[glwagner]

Nice!

I wonder if we should say RotatedLatitudeLongitudeGrid rather than OrthogonalSphericalShellGrid but I see advantages of the latter

[navidcy]

Yes. I think if the show says "RotatedLatitudeLongitudeGrid" is more informative. I’ll add a specific summary method.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 76.92308% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.93%. Comparing base (d012d56) to head (b1d5621).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/Grids/orthogonal_spherical_shell_grid.jl	76.92%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5709      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.94%   73.93%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         418      418              
  Lines       25257    25260       +3     
==========================================
  Hits        18676    18676              
- Misses       6581     6584       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
buildkite	68.57% <76.92%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
julia	68.57% <76.92%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
reactant_1	6.01% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
reactant_2	10.78% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
reactant_3	9.18% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.