CTDL page: the validator is separate, not independent; say who wrote it - #173
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ctdl-validate has the same author as this site. The page headed its findings "What an independent validator found" and introduced the tool right after a sentence about checks "written by the same hand as the export", which read as if someone else had written it. Heading and opening paragraph now say "separate". The validation intro gains one sentence: it has the same author as this site, so it is a second reading of the schema and not an outside review. Spanish strings changed to match. Two docstrings that used the phrase are reworded. CHANGELOG history is left as it was. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…me-author # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this change, and why?
/en/ctdl/and/es/ctdl/headed the validation findings "What an independent validator found". The validator isctdl-validate, which has the same author as this site. The intro made it worse by introducing the tool right after a sentence about checks "written by the same hand as the export", which reads as if someone else wrote the tool.The tool is separate in the way that matters for the check (its own copies of Credential Engine's schema, its own cited rules, no code shared with the exporter), and the page already said so. What it never said was who wrote it.
Changes:
cli.py,ctdl/validate.py) reworded.CHANGELOG.mdhistory untouched; one new entry under Fixed.Found while fact-checking an essay: a checker opened the linked validation statement, saw the tool's source was
github.com/ChelseaKR/ctdl-validate, and flagged "independent" as a major issue. The essay now says "a separate validator I also wrote"; this makes the page agree.Please look at before merging: the two new Spanish sentences are machine-drafted, like the rest of the Spanish (the site's notice covers them). "la misma autora" is feminine on purpose.
Checks
uv run mypy(strict; src, scripts, tests): no issues in 113 source filesruff checkandruff format --checkpass; all pre-commit and pre-push hooks passtsc --noEmitpassesvitest run lib: 426 passed, 9 skipped, 0 failed tests. Two test files (lib/alternates.test.ts,lib/site.test.ts) could not load in a fresh worktree becauseweb/public/data/search-index.jsonis generated and was absent; unrelated to this change, CI builds itmake verifyandcd web && npm run verify(contrast, build, axe) not run locally; leaving to CIAI disclosure: drafted with Claude Code at the repository owner's request. Owner review required before merge.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code