Skip to content

SWI-3723 [Snyk] Security upgrade @actions/github from 5.0.0 to 6.0.0#16

Closed
bwappsec wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-4719fcd6cb1d866f0c8ff25d841e1bc6
Closed

SWI-3723 [Snyk] Security upgrade @actions/github from 5.0.0 to 6.0.0#16
bwappsec wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-4719fcd6cb1d866f0c8ff25d841e1bc6

Conversation

@bwappsec

@bwappsec bwappsec commented Aug 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-OCTOKITPLUGINPAGINATEREST-8730855
  67  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

@bwappsec

bwappsec commented Aug 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

code/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

@bwappsec bwappsec changed the title [Snyk] Security upgrade @actions/github from 5.0.0 to 6.0.0 SWI-3723 [Snyk] Security upgrade @actions/github from 5.0.0 to 6.0.0 Aug 7, 2025
@ckoegel ckoegel closed this Mar 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants