Skip to content

Security: AbdelStark/ProvableWorldModel

Security

SECURITY.md

Security Policy

ProvableWorldModel is a cryptographic proving system. Its central security property is soundness: a verifier must not accept a proof of a false statement. A soundness break is the most severe class of defect in this project, above availability or performance.

Reporting a vulnerability

Do not open a public issue for a suspected vulnerability. Report it privately through GitHub's private vulnerability reporting ("Report a vulnerability" under the repository Security tab). If that channel is unavailable, contact a maintainer privately and request a secure channel before sharing details.

Include, where possible: the affected component or RFC, the relation_id and versions involved, a minimal reproduction (manifest, public input, and witness or artifact), and the security property you believe is violated.

Scope and severity

Class Examples Severity
Soundness A constructed proof that a conformant verifier accepts for a false statement; field-wraparound or unrange-checked value admitting an invalid witness; an unbound manifest field that lets a prover change semantics Critical
Binding A commitment that fails to bind a value the soundness argument assumes is bound Critical
Privacy (when ZK mode is claimed) Witness or private-weight leakage from a proof, trace, lookup, or serialization that is advertised as hiding High when ZK is claimed
Determinism Inputs that produce non-reproducible proof inputs or claimed outputs across conformant runs High
Availability Prover/verifier crash, resource exhaustion Medium

V0 is a succinct validity proof and is not zero-knowledge. Reports asserting a privacy break against V0 are out of scope unless a specific relation explicitly advertised a hiding property. See specs.md.

Process and disclosure

Maintainers acknowledge a report within a target of five business days and propose a remediation and disclosure timeline. Coordinated disclosure is the default; an embargo holds until a fix ships or by mutual agreement. Fixes that change proof semantics mint a new relation_id; see specs.md.

No public soundness claim is made for any relation that has not passed the security-review gate; the threat model, binding requirements, and the "no attention hole" argument are in specs.md, and the testing/mutation gates in specs.md. The pre-pivot soundness/binding checklist (B1–B15) is archived at docs/legacy-stark/security/soundness-binding-checklist.md.

There aren't any published security advisories