Skip to content

How can corrected read counts can be increased from 0? #19

@mhjonathan

Description

@mhjonathan

Hi, I'm applying your tool so usefully and now I'm reviewing from the beginning since I have very robust outcome.

I'm not a statistician but a biologist applying bioinformatic tools/data analysis, so please let me know if it is related with specific statistic principles :) I'll study that for reviewing my data.

After correcting batch effect, I got a corrected taxa count file, and I find out that pretty many taxa which didn't show detected reads in original files are detected in the corrected taxa file.

Same as in your Vignette manual (https://wdl2459.github.io/ConQuR/ConQuR.Vignette.html), Acetitomaculum does exist in 277 sample only in preview, but after correction, all 5 samples in preview get to have reads of the species. How can they have "non-detected" reads in original file? In my point of view, no matter correcting batch effects or confounder effect, it is not detected in real data, and how can they just pop up from nowhere?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions