I'd like to propose that all merges are squash merges when notebooks are involved. Working on a long tutorial in notebook format results in zillions of changes that are collateral damage of editing a single cell. If we do complete revision history merges, this repo will get big fast.
Thoughts?
I'd like to propose that all merges are squash merges when notebooks are involved. Working on a long tutorial in notebook format results in zillions of changes that are collateral damage of editing a single cell. If we do complete revision history merges, this repo will get big fast.
Thoughts?