From what I can tell from my own experiments, the cutoff point from near to far is 100 tiles, not 101.
i.e.
5–99 squares: to the [direction]
100–250 squares: far to the [direction]
So if I'm right, the exiva overlay is off by one. Would be good if someone else could check this too, just in case I made a mistake.
From what I can tell from my own experiments, the cutoff point from near to far is 100 tiles, not 101.
i.e.
5–99 squares: to the [direction]
100–250 squares: far to the [direction]
So if I'm right, the exiva overlay is off by one. Would be good if someone else could check this too, just in case I made a mistake.