|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: Retries |
| 3 | +description: Communicate to API consumers when they should retry requests, and how |
| 4 | + long to wait before retrying. This can help reduce the number of requests being made to an API |
| 5 | + when its having a rough time, and can also help consumers avoid tripping over on rate limits. |
| 6 | +--- |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +Retries are a common pattern in API design, especially when dealing with |
| 9 | +transient errors or rate limits, or connection issues that could have just been |
| 10 | +a bit getting flipped somewhere in the ether, but a second attempt would likely |
| 11 | +work. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +API consumers may or may not automatically retry failed requests, and if they do, they |
| 14 | +may not know how long to wait before retrying. This is especially true for rate |
| 15 | +limits, where the API may be able to handle a burst of requests, but then |
| 16 | +throttle the consumer for a period of time to avoid overwhelming the system. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +To avoid confusing consumers who just want to work with an API, it's a good idea |
| 19 | +to communicate to them how retries should be used in the API, with that |
| 20 | +information clearly explained in API documentation and automatically handled by |
| 21 | +SDKs. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +# Retries in OpenAPI |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +Whilst OpenAPI does not having any dedicated functionality describing retries, |
| 26 | +it does not need to, as HTTP itself has retries covered. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +The `Retry-After` header is defined in RFC 9110 as the standard way to |
| 29 | +communicate that a client or server failure has happened, but that a retry is |
| 30 | +possible after a certain amount of time. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +```yaml |
| 33 | +responses: |
| 34 | + "429": |
| 35 | + description: Too Many Requests |
| 36 | + headers: |
| 37 | + Retry-After: |
| 38 | + description: The number of seconds to wait before retrying the request. |
| 39 | + schema: |
| 40 | + type: integer |
| 41 | + example: 120 |
| 42 | +``` |
| 43 | +
|
| 44 | +The most common usage of Retry-After is using the number of seconds to wait |
| 45 | +before trying again, but it can also be used to communicate a date and time when |
| 46 | +the request can be retried. |
| 47 | +
|
| 48 | +```yaml |
| 49 | +responses: |
| 50 | + "429": |
| 51 | + description: Too Many Requests |
| 52 | + headers: |
| 53 | + Retry-After: |
| 54 | + description: The number of seconds to wait before retrying the request. |
| 55 | + schema: |
| 56 | + type: string |
| 57 | + format: date-time |
| 58 | + example: 2025-07-01T12:00:00Z |
| 59 | +``` |
| 60 | +
|
| 61 | +This header is used in a number of different scenarios, including: |
| 62 | +
|
| 63 | +- 404 Not Found - The server MAY send a Retry-After header field to indicate that the resource is temporarily unavailable, or could exist in the near future. |
| 64 | +- 408 Request Timeout - The server MAY send a Retry-After header field to indicate that it is temporary and after what time the client MAY try again. |
| 65 | +- 409 Conflict - The server MAY send a Retry-After header field to indicate that the conflict could be temporary and suggest a time where it may have been resolved. |
| 66 | +- 413 Content Too Large - If the condition is temporary, the server could send a Retry-After header field to indicate that it is temporary and the client could try again. |
| 67 | +- 429 Too Many Requests - The client has sent too many requests in a given amount of time, and the server is asking the client to wait before sending more requests. |
| 68 | +- 503 Service Unavailable - A service may be unavailable temporarily, so a Retry-After header field could suggest an appropriate amount of time for the client to wait before checking if the service is back. |
| 69 | +
|
| 70 | +Some other 5XX errors could well be retryable, such as 504 Gateway Timeout, and |
| 71 | +a 507 Insufficient Storage might resolve itself, but it's possible to go too |
| 72 | +far. For example, 501 Not Implemented could be seen as temporary because it |
| 73 | +could be implemented soon, but nobody wants API consumers retrying to API |
| 74 | +forever waiting for a feature to be deployed which is never going to be |
| 75 | +deployed. |
| 76 | +
|
| 77 | +Describing every single instance of anything that could ever happen in OpenAPI |
| 78 | +is not the goal of any API documentation because that is impossible. Focusing on |
| 79 | +key areas where retries are likely to be needed is a good balance, and from |
| 80 | +there, API consumers can use their own judgement on whether to retry or not. |
| 81 | +
|
| 82 | +## Examples or constants |
| 83 | +
|
| 84 | +When describing some of these headers it feels important to provide a bit of |
| 85 | +context about what the headers contain, either with an exact value, or if that's |
| 86 | +not possible then some examples of what values might appear. |
| 87 | +
|
| 88 | +Here is an example of how to do that with the `Retry-After` header, using the |
| 89 | +Header Object `example` field: |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +```yaml |
| 92 | +headers: |
| 93 | + Retry-After: |
| 94 | + description: The number of seconds to wait before making another request. |
| 95 | + schema: |
| 96 | + type: integer |
| 97 | + example: 3600 |
| 98 | +``` |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +Using an example here is important because the value of `Retry-After` can vary |
| 101 | +depending on the billing plan the user is on. For example, a free plan might |
| 102 | +have a `Retry-After` value of 60 seconds, while a paid plan might have a |
| 103 | +`Retry-After` value of 10 seconds. |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +If the value of `Retry-After` is always the same, then using `const` inside the |
| 106 | +`schema` object is a good way to indicate that (available from OpenAPI v3.1). |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +```yaml |
| 109 | +headers: |
| 110 | + Retry-After: |
| 111 | + description: The number of seconds to wait before making another request. |
| 112 | + schema: |
| 113 | + type: integer |
| 114 | + const: 3600 |
| 115 | +``` |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +This indicates that the `Retry-After` value is always 3600 seconds, regardless of |
| 118 | +the billing plan the user is on. |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +## x-speakeasy-retries |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +Another ways to communicate how retries should work, is using the Speakeasy |
| 123 | +vendor extension `x-speakeasy-retries`. Using this extension, OpenAPI can |
| 124 | +communicate retry for a particular operation, or the API as a whole, to API |
| 125 | +consumers. |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +This extension can be used to specify the number of retries, the delay between |
| 128 | +retries, and the maximum delay. |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +```yaml |
| 131 | +/webhooks/subscribe: |
| 132 | + post: |
| 133 | + operationId: subscribeToWebhooks |
| 134 | + servers: |
| 135 | + - url: https://speakeasy.bar |
| 136 | + x-speakeasy-usage-example: |
| 137 | + tags: |
| 138 | + - server |
| 139 | + - retries |
| 140 | + x-speakeasy-retries: |
| 141 | + strategy: backoff |
| 142 | + backoff: |
| 143 | + initialInterval: 10 |
| 144 | + maxInterval: 200 |
| 145 | + maxElapsedTime: 1000 |
| 146 | + exponent: 1.15 |
| 147 | +``` |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +This example shows how to use the `x-speakeasy-retries` extension to specify a |
| 150 | +"backoff" strategy for retries, which is a common pattern for retrying failed |
| 151 | +requests with longer waits between retries. The `initialInterval` is the time to |
| 152 | +wait before the first retry, and the `maxInterval` is the maximum time to wait |
| 153 | +between retries. The `maxElapsedTime` is the maximum time to wait before giving |
| 154 | +up on retries, and the `exponent` is the exponent to use for the backoff |
| 155 | +calculation. |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +This approach could be used as well as, or instead of, the `Retry-After` header. |
| 158 | +It would be a good way to add automatic retries to SDKs which means the client |
| 159 | +will be automatically retrying things without needing to learn everything about |
| 160 | +which status codes are retryable, and how long to wait before retrying. |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +## Rate Limits |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +Rate limits are a common use case for retries, and the `Retry-After` header is a |
| 165 | +great way to communicate to API consumers when they should retry requests, and |
| 166 | +how long to wait before retrying. |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +Learn more about [rate limiting with OpenAPI](/openapi/rate-limiting). |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +## Best practices |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +### Examples over constants |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +When describing the `Retry-After` header, it's a good idea to use examples instead of |
| 175 | +constants to allow for flexibility in the API. Some APIs will push up the |
| 176 | +`Retry-After` value during times of high load, and some APIs will have different |
| 177 | +`Retry-After` values depending on the billing plan the user is on. Using |
| 178 | +examples allows for this flexibility, whilst still letting API consumers know |
| 179 | +what sort of values they can expect (e.g: integer vs date-time). |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +### Expand Retry-After in periods of high load |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +When the API is under heavy load, it's a good idea to expand the `Retry-After` |
| 184 | +header to allow for longer wait times between retries. This can help reduce the |
| 185 | +number of requests being made to the API, and can also help consumers avoid |
| 186 | +tripping over on rate limits. |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +### Use exponential backoff |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +When retrying requests, it's a good idea to suggest an exponential backoff |
| 191 | +approach, as a server which is struggling to keep up with requests does not need |
| 192 | +to be hammered with even more requests. Sometimes it needs a moment to recover, |
| 193 | +and clients giving larger gaps between retries can help with that. |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +### Document alternative solutions |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +Once the maximum number of retries has been reached, it's is likely to be an |
| 198 | +actual outage instead of simply a blip in availability. The API client and their |
| 199 | +end-users should be informed of this, and given alternative solutions to the |
| 200 | +problem. This could be a link to a status page, or a support email address. |
| 201 | + |
| 202 | +For example, at a coworking space, when the conference room booking system was |
| 203 | +down, the client would replace the "Submit Booking" button with a message saying |
| 204 | +"The booking system is down, please email somebody@example.org". OpenAPI is a |
| 205 | +great way to communicate this sort of information to API clients so they can use |
| 206 | +it to inform their users. |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | +```yaml |
| 209 | +responses: |
| 210 | + "503": |
| 211 | + description: Service Unavailable |
| 212 | + headers: |
| 213 | + Retry-After: |
| 214 | + description: The number of seconds to wait before making another request. |
| 215 | + schema: |
| 216 | + type: integer |
| 217 | + example: 3600 |
| 218 | + content: |
| 219 | + application/problem+json: |
| 220 | + schema: |
| 221 | + type: object |
| 222 | + properties: |
| 223 | + type: |
| 224 | + type: string |
| 225 | + const: "https://example.com/probs/service-unavailable" |
| 226 | + title: |
| 227 | + type: string |
| 228 | + const: Service Unavailable |
| 229 | + detail: |
| 230 | + type: string |
| 231 | + const: The service is currently unavailable, please try again later, or contact support@example.org to report the issue. |
| 232 | +``` |
0 commit comments