On on-boarding the TU Delft flood models and commercial models (code not yet in physrisk main) we have integrated flood standard of protection in the flood hazard indicators. This was probably a bad move for 3 reasons (!):
- It is desirable to make standard of protection and unprotected flood depth arbitrarily combinable (easier to compare different flood models)
- SoP applies to current conditions
- Exactly how unprotected flood curves are changed by SoP should be a modelling choice and something that can be modified
This change (to hazard and physrisk) is to make SoP a hazard indicator in its own right. This splits the TU Delft sets into two and adds SoP into physrisk explicitly.
On on-boarding the TU Delft flood models and commercial models (code not yet in physrisk main) we have integrated flood standard of protection in the flood hazard indicators. This was probably a bad move for 3 reasons (!):
This change (to
hazardandphysrisk) is to make SoP a hazard indicator in its own right. This splits the TU Delft sets into two and adds SoP into physrisk explicitly.