The problem is that, for measurement, the presets must be loaded onto the device in a specific order—the same order that MatchPatch uses internally. Since MatchPatch cannot use HX Edit's proprietary USB protocol to communicate with the device, this would otherwise have to be done manually, which would be complicated and error-prone.
What might be relatively easy to implement, however, is having MatchPatch merge a handful of .hlx files into a single .hls setlist. The user could then manually import that setlist into a spare Helix setlist bank for measurement. After the process is complete, the user would receive the adjusted .hlx files back. I think that would be both safer and more convenient.
The problem is that, for measurement, the presets must be loaded onto the device in a specific order—the same order that MatchPatch uses internally. Since MatchPatch cannot use HX Edit's proprietary USB protocol to communicate with the device, this would otherwise have to be done manually, which would be complicated and error-prone.
What might be relatively easy to implement, however, is having MatchPatch merge a handful of .hlx files into a single .hls setlist. The user could then manually import that setlist into a spare Helix setlist bank for measurement. After the process is complete, the user would receive the adjusted .hlx files back. I think that would be both safer and more convenient.