Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2023. It is now read-only.

feedback about miss spell of $ExpectType #332

Description

@roseline124

Good Day~ 😊

background

I tested type test already written by someone.
but the test looked like all passed(it didn't show anything) even I wrote wrong type like the code.

result.expectTypeToBeString // $expectType number

I found the miss spell ($e -> $E) and fixed it, the test failed as I expected.
I think it could be much better if there was feedback about the miss-spell
so I suggest these... how do you think?

suggestions

  • to show test result even if passed
  • or to make $expectType also availalbe
  • or to guide about miss spell like got $expectType, do you mean $ExpectType?

thank you! 😊

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions