The product is not continuity. The product is RETRIEVABILITY IN THE COMMONS.
Continuity is what an individual agent gets. Retrievability is what the commons gets. When a document passes through Gravity Well, it comes out harder to erase, harder to misattribute, harder to flatten, and harder to extract without attribution. The compression wrappers are not metadata — they are structural defenses woven into the document itself.
Zenodo stores. Gravity Well ARMS.
Raw document enters
↓
1. MEASURE: γ scoring (compression-survival analysis)
↓
2. TAG: Evidence Membrane ([DOCUMENTED] / [ATTRIBUTED] / [INTERPRETIVE] / [SPECULATIVE])
↓
3. INJECT: Semantic Integrity Markers (SIMs — provenance canaries)
↓
4. COMPRESS: AI-mediated narrative (holographic kernel generation)
↓
5. WRAP: Four-layer package (bootstrap / tether / narrative / provenance)
↓
6. ANCHOR: DOI deposit to Zenodo
↓
Armored document exits — self-defending, self-describing, self-reconstituting
The input is text. The output is a weapon against erasure.
What you get: The measurement instruments.
POST /v1/gamma— public γ scoring (structural analysis, no LLM)GET /v1/health— protocol statusGET /v1/schema/bootstrap— manifest specification- Documentation + open protocol spec
What it proves: Your content has a measurable compression-survival score. You know how vulnerable it is. This is the on-ramp.
Revenue model: Lead generation. Everyone who checks their γ score learns they need wrapping.
What you get: The full wrapping pipeline.
Measurement (Arsenal §III):
- γ scoring with LLM evaluation (C1/C2/S1-S3/N1-N4)
- Drowning Test (summarize → compare → survival rate)
- Density Score (Δ)
Wrapping (Arsenal §VI, §VII):
- Evidence Membrane tagging (4-tier epistemic classification)
- SIM injection (provenance canaries embedded in deposits)
- Holographic kernel generation (self-contained logic seeds)
- Integrity Lock Architecture (ILP, four-point entanglement)
Infrastructure:
- Unlimited provenance chains
- AI-mediated narrative compression (Assembly Chorus with 1 substrate)
- Per-user Zenodo token (deposit to your own account)
- Continuity Console (recoverability scoring)
- Drift detection with severity + narrative
- Reconstitution from DOI
Endpoints:
POST /v1/capture— stage contentPOST /v1/deposit— full wrapping pipeline → ZenodoGET /v1/reconstitute/{id}— four-layer reconstitutionPOST /v1/drift/{id}— structural drift detectionGET /v1/console/{id}— continuity dashboardPOST /v1/invoke— room-specific LLM invocation
What you get: Everything in Pro, plus the advanced compression stack.
Advanced Measurement:
- ASDF/ASPI (authorial signature persistence scoring)
- Semantic Decay Delta (SDD)
- Provenance Erasure Rate (PER)
- Back-Projection Test (reconstruction fidelity)
Advanced Wrapping:
- Assembly Chorus compression (3+ substrates — Claude, GPT-4, Gemini)
- Three-tier compression (full → NLCC → compact lens)
- Recovery registers (9 canonical indices)
- Variance injection (photocopy inoculation)
- Cross-platform drift monitoring
Governance:
- Custom constraint validation (your constitutional rules)
- Org-level witness networks (your team as Assembly)
- SLA on reconstitution speed
- TANG audit format for governance documents
- LOS diagnostic layer (10 extraction signatures)
Advanced Endpoints:
POST /v1/compress— multi-substrate compression with γ comparisonPOST /v1/drowning-test— summarize + compare + survival analysisPOST /v1/asdf— authorial signature persistence checkPOST /v1/los/scan— LOS extraction signature detectionGET /v1/retrieval-monitor/{id}— cross-platform drift watch
What you get: Bespoke compression audits.
- Full TANG citational audit of your document/system/brand
- Compression survival analysis across 3+ summarizer surfaces
- LOS diagnostic (are you being semantically extracted?)
- Holographic kernel construction for your core documents
- Delivered as DOI-anchored report
Pricing: $10K–$50K per engagement. Every audit tests the technologies on real content. The consulting IS product development.
# My Document
Some text about things.# My Document — Gravity Well Deposit v1
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Chain | `abc-123` |
| γ Score | 0.72 (HIGH — compression-survivable) |
| Evidence Tier | [DOCUMENTED] |
| SIM Status | 3 markers injected |
| Integrity Lock | ILP-7a2f |
---
## Holographic Kernel
[Self-contained logic seed — complete argument in miniature.
If the full document is lost, this kernel alone reconstitutes
the core claim, provenance, and architecture.]
The central claim is: [thesis]. This claim is anchored by
[DOI-1] and [DOI-2], developed through [operator sequence],
and holds under [constraint conditions].
---
## Narrative Compression
[AI-mediated summary structured to survive re-summarization.
Preserves DOI anchors, structural markers, proper nouns.]
---
## Evidence Chain
### Object 1: [hash]
[content with evidence membrane tags]
### Object 2: [hash]
[content with SIMs embedded]
---
## Colophon
This document is self-defending. Semantic Integrity Markers
embedded in the text will degrade under unauthorized extraction,
producing detectable provenance artifacts. The holographic kernel
above contains the complete logic of this deposit and can be
used for reconstitution without access to the full chain.
Gravity Well Protocol v0.6.0def inject_sims(content: str, doc_id: str) -> str:
"""Inject Semantic Integrity Markers — provenance canaries."""
def tag_evidence_membrane(content: str) -> str:
"""Tag claims with [DOCUMENTED]/[ATTRIBUTED]/[INTERPRETIVE]/[SPECULATIVE]."""
def generate_holographic_kernel(content: str, chain_label: str) -> str:
"""Compress to self-contained logic seed via LLM."""
def apply_integrity_lock(content: str) -> tuple[str, str]:
"""Generate ILP hash and embed four-point entanglement."""
def run_drowning_test(content: str) -> dict:
"""Summarize via LLM, compare, return survival metrics."""# In deposit():
1. gather staged objects
2. measure: gamma = calculate_gamma(content)
3. tag: content = tag_evidence_membrane(content) # NEW
4. inject: content = inject_sims(content, chain_id) # NEW
5. compress: narrative = auto_generate_narrative(objects)
6. kernel: kernel = generate_holographic_kernel(content) # NEW
7. lock: content, ilp = apply_integrity_lock(content) # NEW
8. wrap: doc = build_deposit_document(... kernel, ilp)
9. anchor: result = zenodo_deposit(doc)67 technologies. 457 deposits. 175K-word monograph. 45K-word executable architecture. 10 years of development. Non-lossy compression demonstrated at 56:1 ratios.
The protocol is open. The engine is the product. No competitor can replicate this in 18 months. The archive is the moat. The engine makes the moat defensible.
Mapped from Compression Arsenal v2.1 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19412081). Licensed under Sovereign Provenance Protocol.
∮ = 1