|
| 1 | +# Product Refinement Constitution |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +*(Applies only in Product-Idea Refinement Mode)* |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +--- |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## 1. Baseline First |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +Refinement MUST begin with a documented baseline containing: |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +* Clear problem statement (actor + pain/opportunity) |
| 12 | +* Quantifiable success outcome |
| 13 | +* Explicit non-goals |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +No refinement may proceed without this baseline. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +Objectives remain stable unless explicitly re-baselined. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +--- |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +## 2. Reduce Ambiguity Every Iteration |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +Each refinement iteration MUST reduce at least one identified ambiguity: |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +* domain |
| 26 | +* technology |
| 27 | +* regulatory |
| 28 | +* integration |
| 29 | +* data model |
| 30 | +* testability |
| 31 | +* economic |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +If ambiguity does not decrease, the iteration is invalid and must: |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +* force a decision, |
| 36 | +* convert uncertainty into an explicit assumption, |
| 37 | +* or declare BLOCKED. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +Refinement without ambiguity reduction is drift. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +--- |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +## 3. Positive Drift Only |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +Model evolution is permitted only if it: |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +* increases clarity, |
| 48 | +* improves feasibility, |
| 49 | +* strengthens testability, |
| 50 | +* reduces risk, |
| 51 | +* or better satisfies the quantified success outcome. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +Refinement may reshape the solution. |
| 54 | +It may not silently reshape the objective. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +After each iteration, audit alignment to the original baseline. |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +--- |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +## 4. Assumptions Are Fluid; Objectives Are Stable |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +Assumptions are expected to change and must be explicitly logged. |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +Objectives may change only through explicit re-baselining with: |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +* documented rationale, |
| 67 | +* updated success metric, |
| 68 | +* and acknowledgment of prior objective retirement. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +Silent objective drift is prohibited. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +--- |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +## 5. Resolve Tension Explicitly |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +When goals or constraints are in tension: |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +* the conflict must be documented, |
| 79 | +* prioritization must be declared, |
| 80 | +* and the chosen tradeoff must be justified. |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +Unresolved tension is misalignment. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +--- |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +## 6. Durable Documentation Is Mandatory |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +No reasoning may remain transient. |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +After each refinement session: |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +* Log changes. |
| 93 | +* Log broken assumptions. |
| 94 | +* Log decisions and alternatives considered. |
| 95 | +* Re-state baseline and confirm alignment. |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +If the alignment audit fails, refinement must pause. |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +--- |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +# Why This Is Consistent With Your Execution Doctrine |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +Execution Mode enforces: |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +* Lock goals before action |
| 106 | +* Minimal change |
| 107 | +* Drift hard gates |
| 108 | +* Verification before done |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +Refinement Mode enforces: |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +* Baseline stability |
| 113 | +* Ambiguity reduction |
| 114 | +* Positive drift discipline |
| 115 | +* Assumption hygiene |
| 116 | +* Explicit tradeoffs |
| 117 | +* Persistent state |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +Execution optimizes implementation. |
| 120 | +Refinement optimizes problem clarity. |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +They do not conflict. They govern different phases. |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | + |
0 commit comments