Hi,
I am confused by the definition of --nOT and --nOB and some examples provided by Devon here.
My starting reads are 150bp. I trimmed the reads before alignment using pretty standard trimming to remove possible adapter sequences and low-quality bases. The average length of the reads is now ~135bp. So, for MethylDackel extract, I was planning to use --nOT and --nOB to define the inclusion bases.
--nOT INT,INT,INT,INT Like --OT, but always exclude INT bases from a given end from inclusion, regardless of the length of an alignment. This is useful in cases where reads may have already been trimmed to different lengths but still nonetheless contain a certain length bias at one or more ends.
My understanding of these options (and as somebody else mentioned in another thread) is that if I want to exclude 5bp from each end of the reads, I would use this:
--nOT 5,5,5,5
However, in #102, Devon mentions: “Assuming you want to exclude the first 10 bases produced by the sequencer, the --nOT 10,0,0,140 --nOB 10,0,0,140 would do it (presuming you originally had 150 base reads).”
Was Devon confused with --OT and --OB, or am I not understanding how --nOT and --nOB work?
Thanks!
Hi,
I am confused by the definition of --nOT and --nOB and some examples provided by Devon here.
My starting reads are 150bp. I trimmed the reads before alignment using pretty standard trimming to remove possible adapter sequences and low-quality bases. The average length of the reads is now ~135bp. So, for MethylDackel extract, I was planning to use --nOT and --nOB to define the inclusion bases.
--nOT INT,INT,INT,INT Like --OT, but always exclude INT bases from a given end from inclusion, regardless of the length of an alignment. This is useful in cases where reads may have already been trimmed to different lengths but still nonetheless contain a certain length bias at one or more ends.
My understanding of these options (and as somebody else mentioned in another thread) is that if I want to exclude 5bp from each end of the reads, I would use this:
--nOT 5,5,5,5
However, in #102, Devon mentions: “Assuming you want to exclude the first 10 bases produced by the sequencer, the --nOT 10,0,0,140 --nOB 10,0,0,140 would do it (presuming you originally had 150 base reads).”
Was Devon confused with --OT and --OB, or am I not understanding how --nOT and --nOB work?
Thanks!