Skip to content

replace rsh with an attribute proc macro #66

@dvc94ch

Description

@dvc94ch

rsh has it's limitations as we don't know the concrete type. this means we can't currently handle something like Future<Iterator<String>> unless we constrain the Iterator to be a Vec. should also help with #45 in providing less cryptic error messages

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions