As per the discussion in chop-dbhi/data-models-service#20, the "reasonable default" behavior for missing attributes on types is causing problems and, frankly, seems hackish. These files should be the single source of truth and there shouldn't be a default behavior buried in some downstream package that determines field type attributes.
We need to fill in desired lengths, precisions, scales, etc across the repo.
As per the discussion in chop-dbhi/data-models-service#20, the "reasonable default" behavior for missing attributes on types is causing problems and, frankly, seems hackish. These files should be the single source of truth and there shouldn't be a default behavior buried in some downstream package that determines field type attributes.
We need to fill in desired lengths, precisions, scales, etc across the repo.