AtlasOA supports evidence collection workflows for all six U.S. regional accreditors plus Perkins V reporting for CTE programs. Atlas K-12 supports state-level accountability reporting (specifics vary by state).
| Accreditor | Region | Key expectation AtlasOA addresses |
|---|---|---|
| HLC (Higher Learning Commission) | North Central / Midwest | Criterion 4.B: ongoing assessment of student learning with documented closing-the-loop |
| SACSCOC | Southern | Standards 8.2.a / 8.2.b: identified outcomes for each program, ongoing assessment, use of results |
| MSCHE (Middle States) | Mid-Atlantic | Standard V: educational effectiveness assessment with clearly stated outcomes and organized processes |
| NWCCU | Northwest | Standards 1.C / 1.D: defined SLOs per program, systematic assessment producing meaningful improvement |
| WSCUC | Western (senior colleges) | Standards 2 and 4: demonstrated program-level outcomes assessment, results used in decision-making |
| ACCJC | Western (community colleges) | Standards II.A.3 / I.B: identified SLOs for courses/programs/certificates, assessment, improvement use |
For each accreditor, AtlasOA produces evidence packages that include:
- Outcome statements at course, program, and institutional level
- The assessment plan and rubrics used
- Aggregated data and trend lines
- The closing-the-loop record (what changed because of the data)
- Verification data from the subsequent cycle
- Perkins V Indicators 1S1-5S3: enrollment, persistence, credentials, work-based learning, special populations
- Annual program review templates matching state CTE office requirements
AtlasOA supports outcome-to-criterion mapping at the level most specialized accreditors require:
- ABET (engineering, technology, computing) — outcome-to-criterion mapping, rubric scoring, course-embedded assessment
- AACSB (business) — assurance-of-learning workflows on the roadmap
- CAEP (educator preparation) — on the roadmap
- ACEN / CCNE (nursing) — outcome mapping supported, specialty reports on the roadmap
For institutions where ABET reporting is the dominant workflow, AEFIS has a deeper ABET-specific toolkit. AtlasOA is the better fit when ABET is one of several reporting needs.
Atlas K-12 produces reports for:
- State student support / MTSS reporting (specifics vary by state, configurable templates)
- SEL screening cycle reports (universal, by grade, by school, by tier)
- Tier-movement reports (how students moved between Universal, Targeted, and Intensive across the year)
- Care Team activity logs for state audit purposes
- Family-facing reports (optional, per-district configurable)
Every assessment cycle in AtlasOA must close with a documented change. The cycle cannot be marked "complete" without recording:
- What we found — the aggregated data
- What we will do differently — a specific, named change
- Who is responsible and by when — name + date
- How we will verify — which outcome to re-measure next cycle
This requirement is enforced at the data-model level so closing-the-loop records cannot be forgotten.
- PDF (for inclusion in self-studies)
- DOCX (for editing inside self-study templates)
- CSV / Excel (for further analysis)
- JSON via REST API (for institutional research teams)
- AACSB-specific reporting templates (Q3 2026)
- CAEP-specific reporting templates (Q3 2026)
- HLC Criterion 5 reporting (governance and resource integration)
- Accreditor-specific evidence package exporters with native templates
See ROADMAP.md for the full list.