Dear package authors,
I created this issue since, for some reason, I'm not able to create a BAU object using auto_BAUs() when then input data is a SpatialPolygonsDataFrame. For example:
library(sp)
library(FRK)
#>
#> Attaching package: 'FRK'
#> The following object is masked from 'package:stats':
#>
#> simulate
library(sf)
#> Linking to GEOS 3.13.0, GDAL 3.10.1, PROJ 9.5.1; sf_use_s2() is TRUE
nc <- st_read(system.file("shape/nc.shp", package="sf"), quiet = TRUE)
nc <- st_transform(nc, 32119)
nc_sp <- as(nc, "Spatial")
class(nc_sp)
#> [1] "SpatialPolygonsDataFrame"
#> attr(,"package")
#> [1] "sp"
auto_BAUs(
manifold = plane(),
cellsize = c(10000, 10000),
type = "grid",
data = nc_sp,
convex = -0.05,
nonconvex_hull = FALSE
) -> tmp
#> Error:
#> ! unable to find an inherited method for function 'coordnames<-' for signature 'x = "SpatialPoints", value = "NULL"'
while equivalent code with SpatialPointsDataFrame works perfectly.
nc_centroid <- nc |> st_centroid()
#> Warning: st_centroid assumes attributes are constant over geometries
nc_centroid_sp <- as(nc_centroid, "Spatial")
class(nc_centroid_sp)
#> [1] "SpatialPointsDataFrame"
#> attr(,"package")
#> [1] "sp"
auto_BAUs(
manifold = plane(),
cellsize = c(10000, 10000),
type = "grid",
data = nc_centroid_sp,
convex = -0.05,
nonconvex_hull = FALSE
) -> tmp
Created on 2026-01-26 with reprex v2.1.1.9000
Just to be clear, this is not a real issue since I can easily fix my real-data problem just by taking the centroids of the polygons, but I was wondering whether I was misinterpreting the docs or there is a real issue in the code. Thanks!
Dear package authors,
I created this issue since, for some reason, I'm not able to create a BAU object using
auto_BAUs()when then input data is aSpatialPolygonsDataFrame. For example:while equivalent code with SpatialPointsDataFrame works perfectly.
Created on 2026-01-26 with reprex v2.1.1.9000
Just to be clear, this is not a real issue since I can easily fix my real-data problem just by taking the centroids of the polygons, but I was wondering whether I was misinterpreting the docs or there is a real issue in the code. Thanks!