This is one of a short string of issues I am opening up after doing some work on the specification document leading up to #28.
The table of array labels in the dictionary has entries for χ(k) and χ(R). It seems the k and r columns should have units. For k, this is presumably inverse Angstroms. For r, Angstroms, picometers, or nanometers (with Angstroms preferred).
Some questions:
- Should Angstrom be spelled with or without diacritic marks over the "A" and "o"?
- And should "inverse Angstrom" be two words with a space between, or a single word (either concatenated or with an underscore)?
Regarding 1, I suggest recognizing [ÅåAa]ngstr[öo]ms?
Regarding 2, The explanation of values with units in the dictionary, as written, is ambiguous as to whether the string explaining the units is a single word or may be multiple words. I propose "inverse
Angstrom" with the multiple spelling of Angstrom suggested above.
This is one of a short string of issues I am opening up after doing some work on the specification document leading up to #28.
The table of array labels in the dictionary has entries for χ(k) and χ(R). It seems the
kandrcolumns should have units. Fork, this is presumably inverse Angstroms. Forr, Angstroms, picometers, or nanometers (with Angstroms preferred).Some questions:
Regarding 1, I suggest recognizing
[ÅåAa]ngstr[öo]ms?Regarding 2, The explanation of values with units in the dictionary, as written, is ambiguous as to whether the string explaining the units is a single word or may be multiple words. I propose "inverse
Angstrom" with the multiple spelling of Angstrom suggested above.