A trit vector is invisible until you map it to color. {-1} as blue, {0} as white, {+1} as red — suddenly the structure of 303 crates becomes a tapestry you can read at a glance.
Ternary data is compact but abstract. Visualization translates trits into human-readable patterns. The right visualization makes bugs obvious, structure visible, and consensus intuitive.
| Trit | Color | Hex | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| {-1} | Deep Blue | #2166ac |
Negative, inhibit, cool |
| {0} | White | #f7f7f7 |
Neutral, hold, rest |
| {+1} | Deep Red | #b2182b |
Positive, excite, heat |
This is a diverging colormap centered at zero. It encodes both magnitude (saturation) and direction (hue).
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
# A 64-element trit vector
trits = [+1, +1, 0, -1, +1, 0, 0, -1, ...] # 64 elements
# As a heat strip
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 1))
plt.imshow([trits], cmap='RdBu_r', vmin=-1, vmax=+1, aspect='auto')
plt.xticks([])
plt.yticks([])
plt.title("Trit Vector: 64 Elements")
plt.show()Patterns become visible: runs of red, blocks of white, alternating stripes. A well-formed ternary vector has structure. Random noise looks uniformly gray.
# A 32×32 ternary weight matrix
W = np.random.choice([-1, 0, +1], size=(32, 32))
plt.figure(figsize=(6, 6))
plt.imshow(W, cmap='RdBu_r', vmin=-1, vmax=+1)
plt.colorbar(ticks=[-1, 0, +1], label='Trit value')
plt.title("Ternary Weight Matrix")
plt.show()What to look for:
- Sparsity: White pixels indicate zero weights. High sparsity = efficient computation.
- Structure: Diagonal patterns indicate self-connections. Blocks indicate feature groups.
- Balance: Equal red and blue suggests the matrix is well-conditioned.
# 10 agents voting on 5 proposals
votes = np.array([
[+1, -1, 0, +1, -1], # Agent 0
[+1, +1, 0, +1, -1], # Agent 1
[-1, -1, 0, 0, +1], # Agent 2
...
])
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 6))
plt.imshow(votes, cmap='RdBu_r', vmin=-1, vmax=+1)
plt.xlabel("Proposal")
plt.ylabel("Agent")
plt.title("Consensus Matrix")
plt.colorbar(ticks=[-1, 0, +1])
plt.show()Interpretation:
- Uniform rows: One agent votes the same on everything (possible bias)
- Uniform columns: All agents agree (strong consensus)
- Scattered: No consensus (needs more discussion)
The 303 crates form a network. Visualize it:
import networkx as nx
# Build graph from dependency data
G = nx.DiGraph()
for crate in fleet.crates:
for dep in crate.dependencies:
G.add_edge(crate.name, dep.name)
# Color by pattern
pattern_colors = {
1: '#e41a1c', # Core Math: red
2: '#377eb8', # Signal: blue
3: '#4daf4a', # Data: green
4: '#984ea3', # Consensus: purple
5: '#ff7f00', # Creative: orange
6: '#ffff33', # Systems: yellow
7: '#a65628', # Formal: brown
}
pos = nx.spring_layout(G, k=0.3)
colors = [pattern_colors[fleet.get_pattern(node)] for node in G.nodes()]
plt.figure(figsize=(14, 14))
nx.draw(G, pos, node_color=colors, node_size=30, alpha=0.7, arrows=False)
plt.title("Ternary Fleet: 303 Crates by Pattern")
plt.show()The transfer stations appear as large hubs. The ring structure emerges as a circular layout. Peripheral crates cluster at the edges.
# Context window usage breakdown
labels = ['System', 'History', 'Muscle Memory', 'Improvisation']
sizes = [2000, 5000, 30000, 85000] # Tokens in 128k window
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 8))
plt.pie(sizes, labels=labels, autopct='%1.1f%%', startangle=90)
plt.title("Context Window Allocation (with Muscle Memory)")
plt.show()Without muscle memory, the pie would show 93% spent on loading source. With muscle memory, 66% is free for improvisation.
A complete monitoring dashboard for a ternary system:
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(12, 10))
# Top-left: Verification entropy over time
axes[0,0].plot(entropy_history)
axes[0,0].axhline(y=3.0, color='g', linestyle='--', label='Healthy')
axes[0,0].set_title("Verification Entropy")
axes[0,0].legend()
# Top-right: Ternary signal stream
axes[0,1].imshow([signal_stream[-100:]], cmap='RdBu_r', aspect='auto')
axes[0,1].set_title("Last 100 Signals")
# Bottom-left: Consensus heatmap
axes[1,0].imshow(consensus_matrix, cmap='RdBu_r')
axes[1,0].set_title("Agent Consensus")
# Bottom-right: Memory usage
axes[1,1].bar(['FP32', 'Ternary'], [64, 4])
axes[1,1].set_title("Memory Usage (MB)")
axes[1,1].set_ylabel("MB")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()This dashboard answers four questions at a glance:
- Is correctness being preserved? (entropy)
- Is the system stable? (signal stream)
- Are agents agreeing? (consensus)
- Are we saving memory? (usage)
- BENCHMARKING-TERNARY.md — Visualize performance data
- FLEET-MAP.md — The graph visualization of 303 crates
- CONSERVATION-LAWS.md — Visualize entropy and attention metrics
- CASE-STUDIES.md — Real-world data to visualize
Generate your first ternary visualization:
import openmind
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Load a crate's weight matrix
mm = openmind.MuscleMemory.load("ternary-core_muscles.json")
W = mm.get_weight_matrix("tdot")
# Visualize
plt.imshow(W, cmap='RdBu_r', vmin=-1, vmax=+1)
plt.colorbar(ticks=[-1, 0, +1])
plt.title("tdot Weight Matrix")
plt.savefig("tdot_weights.png")A picture of ternary data is worth 1,024 trits of explanation.