You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: results/readme.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ They provide the **raw risk distribution** before clustering and help validate t
14
14
15
15
| Plot | Description |
16
16
|------|-------------|
17
-
||**Claim Frequency (`Sim_Frequency`)** – Poisson-like, heavily right-skewed. ~12 k customers have **0 claims**, ~11 k have **1 claim**, then a rapid drop. A tiny tail reaches **≥ 10 claims**. |
17
+
||**Claim Frequency (`Sim_Frequency`)** – Poisson-like, heavily right-skewed. ~8k k customers have **0 claims**, ~12 k have **1 claim**,~11 k have **2 claim** then a rapid drop. A tiny tail reaches **≥ 10 claims**. |
18
18
||**Expected Loss (`Expected_Loss`)** – Highly skewed, with a sharp peak at **0 €** (most safe drivers) and a long tail up to ~2 000 €. |
19
19
||**Total Severity (`Sim_Total_Loss`)** – Similar shape to Expected Loss (log-normal behavior). Most policies have **low total payout**; a few extreme cases exceed 2 000 €. |
20
20
||**Frequency vs Total Severity**, coloured by **Risk Profile (0–3)** – Strong positive correlation (higher frequency → higher total loss). Higher `Risk Profile` values systematically sit on the upper-right part of the cloud, confirming the simulation logic. |
0 commit comments