Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Hi @Bozy26
Yes I did tested it last year's Agritechnica but it did not loaded at all. Unfortunately I do not have any logs from it. I am unsure what functionality was it loaded with as it was part of a demo installation.
That was not a necessary change, but a nice to have feature 😄 If you get your paws on an unit I will try to help you get it rolling. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
I'm building a project where AgOpenGPS and AgIsoVirtualTerminal both run on the same Windows tablet. AgOpenGPS/AgIO broadcasts speed and section data over UDP (localhost), which is picked up by a small bridge application (based on the seeder_example) and relayed to the VT over CAN via the AgIsoStack++ TC client. For real hardware, the tablet connects to the implement's ISOBUS network through a USB-CAN adapter (PCAN-USB).
Before connecting real hardware, I'd like to check compatibility with an ARAG IBX100 sprayer control unit (ISOBUS version). Has anyone here tried connecting an IBX100 (or any other ARAG ISOBUS ECU) to AgIsoVirtualTerminal? Specifically I'm wondering about:
Whether the IBX100's object pool renders correctly (no missing objects, correct layout)
Whether Task Controller communication (section control, rate control) works as expected
Any known quirks or workarounds needed, similar to the ProductIdentification PGN issue that was found with Kverneland implements (#54)
Any experience, logs, or even partial testing reports would be really helpful before I invest in the hardware. Happy to share back my own results once I get a unit to test with.
Thanks in advance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions