The specific emission I'm looking at now is chloromethane emissions in this process, which are two orders of magnitude higher than other contributing sources in a product system I evaluated. Looking deeper into it, I suspect this is another issue of either a mis-matched facility - industrial facility being matched to this hydro plan or potentially industrial emissions from the same site (as we previously noticed for a couple solar PV plants). Easy fix now would be to omit NEI data (and probably RCRAInfo and TRI) from the hydro plants in general. It's possible this mismatch is created upstream in StEWI.
The two hydro plants in MISO responsible for the chloromethane emissions: EIA IDs 3971 and 3974.
The specific emission I'm looking at now is chloromethane emissions in this process, which are two orders of magnitude higher than other contributing sources in a product system I evaluated. Looking deeper into it, I suspect this is another issue of either a mis-matched facility - industrial facility being matched to this hydro plan or potentially industrial emissions from the same site (as we previously noticed for a couple solar PV plants). Easy fix now would be to omit NEI data (and probably RCRAInfo and TRI) from the hydro plants in general. It's possible this mismatch is created upstream in StEWI.
The two hydro plants in MISO responsible for the chloromethane emissions: EIA IDs 3971 and 3974.