OpenInclusiveSciComm.bib

@misc{2016,
  title = {Introduction to {{R Markdown}} \& {{Knitr}} - {{Connect Data}}, {{Methods}} and {{Results}}},
  year = {2016},
  month = dec,
  journal = {Earth Data Science - Earth Lab},
  abstract = {Learn what open science is and how R Markdown can help you document your work.},
  howpublished = {https://www.earthdatascience.org/courses/earth-analytics/document-your-science/about-open-science-and-why-open-science-is-important/},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\25QHUMYI\\about-open-science-and-why-open-science-is-important.html}
}

@article{bahlai2019,
  title = {Open {{Science Isn}}'t {{Always Open}} to {{All Scientists}}},
  author = {Bahlai, Christie and Bartlett, Lewis and Burgio, Kevin and Fournier, Auriel and Keiser, Carl and Poisot, Timoth{\'e}e and Whitney, Kaitlin},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {Am. Sci.},
  volume = {107},
  number = {2},
  pages = {78},
  issn = {0003-0996, 1545-2786},
  doi = {10.1511/2019.107.2.78},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\AZQLQDW6\\Bahlai et al. - 2019 - Open Science Isn't Always Open to All Scientists.pdf}
}

@article{bastille2021,
  title = {Improving the {{IEA Approach Using Principles}} of {{Open Data Science}}},
  author = {Bastille, Kimberly and Hardison, Sean and {deWitt}, Lynn and Brown, Jennifer and Samhouri, Jameal and Gaichas, Sarah and Lucey, Sean and Kearney, Kelly and Best, Ben and Cross, Scott and Large, Scott and Spooner, Ellen},
  year = {2021},
  month = jan,
  journal = {Coastal Management},
  volume = {49},
  number = {1},
  pages = {72--89},
  publisher = {{Taylor \& Francis}},
  issn = {0892-0753},
  doi = {10.1080/08920753.2021.1846155},
  abstract = {Integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs) compile and use indicators, risk assessments, and other analyses to address regional policy needs at varying spatial scales. Although approaches to implementing IEAs are context-specific, challenges in data acquisition, management, processing, analysis, and communication are universal. By embracing open science, in which scientific data, methods, and products are made publicly accessible, along with the ever-expanding tools facilitating open science, IEA practitioners will be better equipped to address these challenges. Here, we provide a snapshot of the state of open science practices in IEAs on-going across the United States. We show that open science has improved the flexibility, reproducibility, and efficiency of the scientific workflows within the IEA framework. Although the initial time investment necessary for developing open science workflows may appear daunting, we show that the subsequent returns provided by the efficient and transparent development of IEA products are worth the effort. By improving the implementation of IEAs, open science tools and principals have the potential to further Ecosystem Based Management (EBM) worldwide.},
  keywords = {IEA framwork,open science,reproducilibity},
  annotation = {\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846155},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\CLAWUFKP\\Bastille et al. - 2021 - Improving the IEA Approach Using Principles of Ope.pdf;C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\FCMHRE2N\\08920753.2021.html}
}

@article{binder2010,
  title = {Routes to {{Attention}} or {{Shortcuts}} to {{Apathy}}? Exploring {{Domain}}-{{Specific Communication Pathways}} and {{Their Implications}} for {{Public Perceptions}} of {{Controversial Science}}},
  shorttitle = {Routes to {{Attention}} or {{Shortcuts}} to {{Apathy}}?},
  author = {Binder, Andrew R.},
  year = {2010},
  month = sep,
  journal = {Science Communication},
  volume = {32},
  number = {3},
  pages = {383--411},
  publisher = {{SAGE Publications Inc}},
  issn = {1075-5470},
  doi = {10.1177/1075547009345471},
  abstract = {Recent research in communication has emphasized interpersonal discussion as a potential mediator or moderator of the media effects on audiences. In this study, the author develops a similar model to explore public perceptions of science. In addition to communication variables, this model incorporates the notion of domain-specific pathways as determinants of attitudinal and cognitive outcomes. As a case study, the model is applied to salience of climate change, and the results reveal evidence for the mediation of media effects on salience through interpersonal discussion. Moreover, two domain-specific communication pathways?one focusing on politics and the other on science?have differential impacts on the outcome. These results are discussed in terms of integrating interpersonal communication into existing models of public perceptions of science controversy.},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\MP4ATJGR\\Binder - 2010 - Routes to Attention or Shortcuts to Apathy Explor.pdf}
}

@techreport{canfield2020,
  title = {The {{State}} of {{Inclusive Science Communication}}: A {{Landscape Study}}},
  author = {Canfield, Katherine and Menezes, Sunshine},
  year = {2020},
  pages = {77},
  address = {{Kingston, RI}},
  institution = {{Metcalf Institute, University of Rhode Island}},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\K6Z6TLML\\Canfield and Menezes - 2020 - The State of Inclusive Science Communication A La.pdf}
}

@article{chan2021,
  title = {A "Data Sharing Trust" Model for Rapid, Collaborative Science},
  author = {Chan, Vincent and Gherardini, Pier Federico and Krummel, Matthew F. and Fragiadakis, Gabriela K.},
  year = {2021},
  month = feb,
  journal = {Cell},
  volume = {184},
  number = {3},
  pages = {566--570},
  issn = {1097-4172},
  doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.006},
  abstract = {Complex datasets provide opportunities for discoveries beyond their initial scope. Effective and rapid data sharing and management practices are crucial to realize this potential; however, they are harder to implement than post-publication access. Here, we introduce the concept of a "data sharing trust" to maximize the value of large datasets.},
  langid = {english},
  pmid = {33545032},
  keywords = {Authorship,Cooperative Behavior,Humans,Information Dissemination,Models; Theoretical,Research Personnel,Trust},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\XS9KCXBS\\Chan et al. - 2021 - A “data sharing trust” model for rapid, collaborat.pdf}
}

@book{committeeontowardanopenscienceenterprise2018,
  title = {Open {{Science}} by {{Design}}: Realizing a {{Vision}} for 21st {{Century Research}}},
  shorttitle = {Open {{Science}} by {{Design}}},
  author = {{Committee on Toward an Open Science Enterprise} and {Board on Research Data and Information} and {Policy and Global Affairs} and {National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine}},
  year = {2018},
  month = aug,
  pages = {25116},
  publisher = {{National Academies Press}},
  address = {{Washington, D.C.}},
  doi = {10.17226/25116},
  isbn = {978-0-309-47624-9},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\48WIKJB8\\Committee on Toward an Open Science Enterprise et al. - 2018 - Open Science by Design Realizing a Vision for 21s.pdf}
}

@article{fox2021,
  title = {Open {{Science}}, {{Closed Doors}}? Countering {{Marginalization}} through an {{Agenda}} for {{Ethical}}, {{Inclusive Research}} in {{Communication}}},
  author = {Fox, Jesse and Pearce, Katy E and Massanari, Adrienne L and Riles, Julius Matthew and Szulc, {\L}ukasz and Ranjit, Yerina S and Trevisan, Filippo and Soriano, Cheryll Ruth R and Vitak, Jessica and Arora, Payal and Joo, Sun and Alper, Meryl and Gambino, Andrew and Gonzalez, Carmen and Lynch, Teresa and Williamson, Lillie D and Gonzales, Amy L},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Journal of Communication},
  pages = {21},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\6YIKCTAE\\Fox et al. - 2021 - Open Science, Closed Doors Countering Marginaliza.pdf}
}

@article{huang2013,
  title = {Why Do Group Members Provide Information to Digital Knowledge Repositories? A Multilevel Application of Transactive Memory Theory},
  shorttitle = {Why Do Group Members Provide Information to Digital Knowledge Repositories?},
  author = {Huang, Meikuan and Barbour, Joshua and Su, Chunke and Contractor, Noshir},
  year = {2013},
  journal = {Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology},
  volume = {64},
  number = {3},
  pages = {540--557},
  issn = {1532-2890},
  doi = {10.1002/asi.22805},
  abstract = {The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {information storage and retrieval systems,knowledge management,management information systems},
  annotation = {\_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asi.22805},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\LNBQPELT\\Huang et al. - 2013 - Why do group members provide information to digita.pdf;C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\P5ELVAYH\\asi.html}
}

@article{kim2006,
  title = {Civic {{Engagement From}} a {{Communication Infrastructure Perspective}}},
  author = {Kim, Yong-Chan and {Ball-Rokeach}, Sandra J.},
  year = {2006},
  month = may,
  journal = {Commun Theory},
  volume = {16},
  number = {2},
  pages = {173--197},
  issn = {1050-3293, 1468-2885},
  doi = {10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00267.x},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\Y3U9NLJU\\Kim and Ball-Rokeach - 2006 - Civic Engagement From a Communication Infrastructu.pdf}
}

@inproceedings{kossinets2008,
  title = {The Structure of Information Pathways in a Social Communication Network},
  booktitle = {Proceeding of the 14th {{ACM SIGKDD}} International Conference on {{Knowledge}} Discovery and Data Mining - {{KDD}} 08},
  author = {Kossinets, Gueorgi and Kleinberg, Jon and Watts, Duncan},
  year = {2008},
  pages = {435},
  publisher = {{ACM Press}},
  address = {{Las Vegas, Nevada, USA}},
  doi = {10.1145/1401890.1401945},
  abstract = {Social networks are of interest to researchers in part because they are thought to mediate the flow of information in communities and organizations. Here we study the temporal dynamics of communication using on-line data, including e-mail communication among the faculty and staff of a large university over a two-year period. We formulate a temporal notion of ``distance'' in the underlying social network by measuring the minimum time required for information to spread from one node to another \textemdash{} a concept that draws on the notion of vector-clocks from the study of distributed computing systems. We find that such temporal measures provide structural insights that are not apparent from analyses of the pure social network topology. In particular, we define the network backbone to be the subgraph consisting of edges on which information has the potential to flow the quickest. We find that the backbone is a sparse graph with a concentration of both highly embedded edges and long-range bridges \textemdash{} a finding that sheds new light on the relationship between tie strength and connectivity in social networks.},
  isbn = {978-1-60558-193-4},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\ANIL65Y8\\Kossinets et al. - 2008 - The structure of information pathways in a social .pdf}
}

@article{lauer2020,
  title = {Implementing a Transactional Design Model to Ensure the Mindful Development of Public-Facing Science Communication Projects},
  author = {Lauer, Claire},
  year = {2020},
  month = nov,
  journal = {Commun. Des. Q. Rev},
  volume = {8},
  number = {3},
  pages = {4--15},
  issn = {2166-1642},
  doi = {10.1145/3410430.3436988},
  abstract = {This paper introduces the concept of transactional design\textemdash integrating Druschke's ``transactional'' model of rhetoric and science and Kinsella's model of ``public expertise''\textemdash to demonstrate how technical communication and user experience (UX) designers and researchers can play an essential role in helping scientists cultivate meaningful relationships with members of the public toward the goal of making scientific content more accessible and actionable. This paper reports on the challenges that arose when a water modeling system built for experts was adapted for a public museum audience. It discusses specific issues the UX team had in contending with outdated ``deficit'' and ``conduit'' models of communication when working with scientists to adapt the system; it provides a checklist for steps that technical communication and UX designers and researchers\textemdash as those who best understand audiences and work directly with users\textemdash can champion the idea of transactional design to setup knowledge-making partnerships toward the coconstruction of public-facing scientific communication projects.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\CT72AE4Q\\Lauer - 2020 - Implementing a transactional design model to ensur.pdf}
}

@article{lewis2020,
  title = {Open {{Communication Science}}: A {{Primer}} on {{Why}} and {{Some Recommendations}} for {{How}}},
  shorttitle = {Open {{Communication Science}}},
  author = {Lewis, Neil A.},
  year = {2020},
  month = apr,
  journal = {Communication Methods and Measures},
  volume = {14},
  number = {2},
  pages = {71--82},
  publisher = {{Routledge}},
  issn = {1931-2458},
  doi = {10.1080/19312458.2019.1685660},
  abstract = {Communication scientists devote large amounts of resources to conducting studies to improve our understanding of the social world, in hopes that our efforts contribute to improving people's life outcomes. Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, the process by which our research is conducted is not always clear in journal articles or books reporting our research. This lack of process-insight (a) limits our ability to build on each other's research, (b) limits our holistic understanding of communication processes, and (c) limits the ability of consumers of our research to put it into practice. The current article discusses recent methodological advances designed to address these issues \textendash{} advances in open science practices. I provide a brief primer on the philosophy behind open science and its relevance for communication research, then provide recommendations for both novice and expert researchers to implement open science practices at multiple steps of the research pipeline.},
  annotation = {\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1685660},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\WBVXCYF8\\Lewis - 2020 - Open Communication Science A Primer on Why and So.pdf;C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\PBXIBAKY\\19312458.2019.html}
}

@article{lowndes2017,
  title = {Our Path to Better Science in Less Time Using Open Data Science Tools},
  author = {Lowndes, Julia S. Stewart and Best, Benjamin D. and Scarborough, Courtney and Afflerbach, Jamie C. and Frazier, Melanie R. and O'Hara, Casey C. and Jiang, Ning and Halpern, Benjamin S.},
  year = {2017},
  month = jun,
  journal = {Nat Ecol Evol},
  volume = {1},
  number = {6},
  pages = {0160},
  issn = {2397-334X},
  doi = {10.1038/s41559-017-0160},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\DS3J26RV\\Lowndes et al. - 2017 - Our path to better science in less time using open.pdf}
}

@article{macarthur2020,
  title = {Bridging {{Science}} with {{Society}}: Defining {{Pathways}} for {{Engagement}}},
  shorttitle = {Bridging {{Science}} with {{Society}}},
  author = {MacArthur, Brenda L. and Lindenfeld, Laura A. and Aurbach, Elyse and Bevan, Bronwyn and Newman, Todd P.},
  year = {2020},
  month = dec,
  journal = {Communication Center Journal},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {62--78},
  abstract = {Science communication training organizations, are uniquely positioned at the nexus of science and society. Through research and training, they empower scientists to engage with the public to ultimately improve how science informs decision-making processes at the individual, organizational, and community levels. This paper argues that science communication training organizations must unite to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive set of offerings that empower scientists to master foundational communication skills while recognizing the complete social and cultural systems in which their science communication occurs. We present three separate possible pathways training programs could take, depending on the contexts and audiences for engagement. We differentiate between the goals, sites, and audiences for engagement, and the forms of knowledge or preparation needed for productive engagement.},
  copyright = {Copyright (c) 2020 Brenda L MacArthur, Laura A Lindenfeld, Elyse Aurbach, Bronwyn Bevan, Todd P Newman},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\DJYP5Y4X\\MacArthur et al. - 2020 - Bridging Science with Society Defining Pathways f.pdf}
}

@incollection{motta2016,
  title = {Community through Multiple Connectivities: Mapping Communication Assets in Multicultural {{London}}},
  shorttitle = {Community through Multiple Connectivities},
  booktitle = {Communicating the {{City}}: Meanings, {{Practices}}, {{Interactions}}},
  author = {Motta, Wallis and Georgiou, Myria},
  year = {2016},
  month = jan,
  series = {Urban {{Communication}}},
  volume = {4},
  pages = {215},
  publisher = {{Peter Lang}},
  address = {{New York}},
  isbn = {978-1-4331-3751-8},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\5NEK7RLN\\Geourgiou_Community_through_multiple_connectivities.pdf}
}

@article{nadkarni2019,
  title = {Beyond the {{Deficit Model}}: The {{Ambassador Approach}} to {{Public Engagement}}},
  shorttitle = {Beyond the {{Deficit Model}}},
  author = {Nadkarni, Nalini M and Weber, Caitlin Q and Goldman, Shelley V and Schatz, Dennis L and Allen, Sue and Menlove, Rebecca},
  year = {2019},
  month = apr,
  journal = {BioScience},
  volume = {69},
  number = {4},
  pages = {305--313},
  issn = {0006-3568, 1525-3244},
  doi = {10.1093/biosci/biz018},
  abstract = {Scientists are increasingly motivated to engage the public, particularly those who do not or cannot access traditional science education opportunities. Communication researchers have identified shortcomings of the deficit model approach, which assumes that skepticism toward science is based on a lack of information or scientific literacy, and encourage scientists to facilitate open-minded exchange with the public. We describe an ambassador approach, to develop a scientist's impact identity, which integrates his or her research, personal interests and experiences to achieve societal impacts. The scientist identifies a community or focal group to engage, on the basis of his or her impact identity, learns about that group, and promotes inclusion of all group members by engaging in venues in which that group naturally gathers, rather than in traditional education settings. Focal group members stated that scientists communicated effectively and were responsive to participant questions and ideas. Scientists reported professional and personal benefits from this approach.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\CZKSPEFZ\\Nadkarni et al. - 2019 - Beyond the Deficit Model The Ambassador Approach .pdf}
}

@techreport{nationalacademiesofsciencesengineeringandmedicine2020,
  title = {Advancing {{Open Science Practices}}: Stakeholder {{Perspectives}} on {{Incentives}} and {{Disincentives}}: Proceedings of a {{Workshop}} in {{Brief}}},
  shorttitle = {Advancing {{Open Science Practices}}},
  author = {{National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine}},
  year = {2020},
  month = feb,
  pages = {25725},
  address = {{Washington, D.C.}},
  institution = {{National Academies Press}},
  doi = {10.17226/25725},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\MF5YWQ52\\Board on Research Data and Information et al. - 2020 - Advancing Open Science Practices Stakeholder Pers.pdf}
}

@article{nosek2012,
  title = {Scientific {{Utopia}}: I. {{Opening Scientific Communication}}},
  shorttitle = {Scientific {{Utopia}}},
  author = {Nosek, Brian A. and {Bar-Anan}, Yoav},
  year = {2012},
  month = jul,
  journal = {Psychological Inquiry},
  volume = {23},
  number = {3},
  pages = {217--243},
  issn = {1047-840X, 1532-7965},
  doi = {10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\8H5WBPTG\\Nosek and Bar-Anan - 2012 - Scientific Utopia I. Opening Scientific Communica.pdf}
}

@article{powell2020,
  title = {Tech Tools to Make Research More Open and Inclusive},
  author = {Powell, Kendall},
  year = {2020},
  month = feb,
  journal = {Nature},
  volume = {578},
  number = {7793},
  pages = {181--182},
  issn = {0028-0836, 1476-4687},
  doi = {10.1038/d41586-020-00216-z},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\NKL36MK5\\Powell - 2020 - Tech tools to make research more open and inclusiv.pdf}
}

@article{risien2018,
  title = {Unveiling {{Impact Identities}}: A {{Path}} for {{Connecting Science}} and {{Society}}},
  shorttitle = {Unveiling {{Impact Identities}}},
  author = {Risien, Julie and Storksdieck, Martin},
  year = {2018},
  month = jul,
  journal = {Integrative and Comparative Biology},
  volume = {58},
  number = {1},
  pages = {58--66},
  issn = {1540-7063, 1557-7023},
  doi = {10.1093/icb/icy011},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\3Z66JAHQ\\Risien and Storksdieck - 2018 - Unveiling Impact Identities A Path for Connecting.pdf}
}

@article{rose2020,
  title = {Scientists' Incentives and Attitudes toward Public Communication},
  author = {Rose, Kathleen M. and Markowitz, Ezra M. and Brossard, Dominique},
  year = {2020},
  month = jan,
  journal = {PNAS},
  volume = {117},
  number = {3},
  pages = {1274--1276},
  publisher = {{National Academy of Sciences}},
  issn = {0027-8424, 1091-6490},
  doi = {10.1073/pnas.1916740117},
  abstract = {In an era of large-scale science-related challenges and rapid advancements in groundbreaking science with major societal implications, communicating about science is critical. The profile of science communication has increased over the last few decades, with multiple sectors calling for such activities. As scientists respond to calls for public-facing communication, we need to evaluate where the scientific community stands. We conducted a unique census of science faculty at land-grant universities across the United States intended to spur the next generation of science communicators and research. Despite scientists' strong approval of science communication efforts, potential areas of tension, attributable to lack of institutional support and confidence in communication skills, constrain these efforts.},
  chapter = {Social Sciences},
  copyright = {Copyright \textcopyright{} 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).},
  langid = {english},
  pmid = {31911470},
  keywords = {engagement with science,public universities,science communication},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\P2ZD777J\\Rose et al. - 2020 - Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public.pdf;C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\5F4X8S8V\\1274.html}
}

@article{seo2019,
  title = {{{LaTeX}} Is {{NOT Easy Creating Accessible Scientific Documents}} with {{R Markdown}}},
  author = {Seo, JooYoung and McCurry, Sean},
  year = {2019},
  pages = {15},
  abstract = {Although recent advancements in assistive technology has increasingly enabled people who are blind or visually impaired to challenge themselves to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects and careers, there is a lack of authoring tools available to independently produce scientific documents and materials which are inevitably necessary for a better communication in mainstream practices. While LaTeX, a plain-text-based document preparation system, has been considered an accessible full-fledged authoring and reference management tool, its steep learning curve and limited output type to PDF have made some blind people, who lack programming background and/or who would like to produce different accessible output formats, discouraged. This paper calls attention to the need of introducing an easy-to-write and accessible scientific document authoring tool by defining the scope of a scientific document, highlighting some issues of the conventional methods that the blind community has employed for document production, and suggesting an R Markdown system as a compelling solution. This research has developed and detailed the Accessible RMarkdown Online Writer (AROW) as a hands-on demonstration that proves its capability for highly accessible scientific document production that can be done by a blind individual in multiple formats including Word, RTF, PDF, MathML/MathJax enabled HTML, and presentations.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\APU5I8RG\\Seo and McCurry - 2019 - LaTeX is NOT Easy Creating Accessible Scientific D.pdf}
}

@article{vanlissa2021,
  title = {{{WORCS}}: A Workflow for Open Reproducible Code in Science},
  shorttitle = {{{WORCS}}},
  author = {Van Lissa, Caspar J. and Brandmaier, Andreas M. and Brinkman, Loek and Lamprecht, Anna-Lena and Peikert, Aaron and Struiksma, Marijn E. and Vreede, Barbara M. I.},
  year = {2021},
  month = jan,
  journal = {Data Science},
  volume = {4},
  number = {1},
  pages = {29--49},
  publisher = {{IOS Press}},
  issn = {2451-8484},
  doi = {10.3233/DS-210031},
  abstract = {Adopting open science principles can be challenging, requiring conceptual education and training in the use of new tools. This paper introduces the Workflow for Open Reproducible Code in Science (WORCS): A step-by-step procedure that researchers can},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\CLLA4KY2\\Van Lissa et al. - 2021 - WORCS A workflow for open reproducible code in sc.pdf;C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\ZJAFB83G\\ds210031.html}
}

@article{villanueva2016,
  title = {Communication {{Asset Mapping}}: An {{Ecological Field Application Toward Building Healthy Communities}}},
  shorttitle = {Communication {{Asset Mapping}}},
  author = {Villanueva, George and Broad, Garrett M. and Gonzalez, Carmen and {Ball-Rokeach}, Sandra and Murphy, Sheila},
  year = {2016},
  month = may,
  journal = {International Journal of Communication},
  volume = {10},
  number = {0},
  pages = {21},
  issn = {1932-8036},
  abstract = {Guided by an integrated theoretical approach combining communication infrastructure theory with methods of assets-oriented community field mapping, this study reports the findings of an engaged scholarship project we term communication asset mapping (CAM). Ecological in orientation and participatory in practice, CAM represents a tool for analyzing urban spaces' potential as mediums for building healthy communities. This article offers two case studies from different low-income neighborhoods in Los Angeles, the first a researcher-directed CAM application and the second undertaken in collaboration with community health promotion workers. Both offer insights for researchers and practitioners interested in the intersecting roles of communication and place in creating positive community change.},
  copyright = {The  International Journal of Communication  is an academic journal. As such, it is dedicated to the open exchange of information. For this reason, IJoC is freely available to individuals and institutions. Copies of this journal or articles in this journal may be distributed for research or educational purposes free of charge and without permission. However, commercial use of the IJoC website or the articles contained herein is expressly prohibited without the written consent of the editor. Authors who publish in The  International Journal of Communication  will release their articles under the   Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) license  . This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights authors grants users of their work, see the  "human-readable summary" of the license , with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.) This journal utilizes the  LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. The publisher perpetually authorizes participants in the LOCKSS system to archive and restore our publication through the LOCKSS System for the benefit of all LOCKSS System participants. Specifically participating libraries may:  Collect and preserve currently accessible materials;  Use material consistent with original license terms;  Provide copies to other LOCKSS appliances for purposes of audit and repair.   ~    Fair Use The U.S. Copyright Act of 1976 specifies, in Section 107, the terms of the Fair Use exception: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:  the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;  the nature of the copyrighted work;  the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; \&  the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.   The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. In accord with these provisions, the  International Journal of Communication  believes in the vigorous assertion and defense of Fair Use by scholars engaged in academic research, teaching and non-commercial publishing. Thus, we view the inclusion of ``quotations'' from existing print, visual, audio and audio-visual texts to be appropriate examples of Fair Use, as are reproductions of visual images for the purpose of scholarly analysis. We encourage authors to obtain appropriate permissions to use materials originally produced by others, but do not require such permissions as long as the usage of such materials falls within the boundaries of Fair Use.  The  International Journal of Communication  encourages authors to employ fair use in their scholarly publishing wherever appropriate. Fair use is the right to use unlicensed copyrighted material (whether it is text, images, audio-visual, or other) in your own work, in some circumstances. We consult the  Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Scholarly Research in Communication , created by the International Communication Association and endorsed by the National Communication Association, and you should too. If you have any questions about whether fair use applies to your uses of copyrighted material (whether it is text, images, audio-visual, or other) in your scholarship, simply include your rationale, grounded in the Best Practices, as a supplementary document with your submission.},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {and place,communication asset mapping,communication infrastructure,engaged scholarship,healthy communities,participatory research,space},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\HUG2W3YZ\\Villanueva et al. - 2016 - Communication Asset Mapping An Ecological Field A.pdf}
}

@article{watts2015,
  title = {Achieving {{Broader Impacts}} in the {{National Science Foundation}}, {{Division}} of {{Environmental Biology}}},
  author = {Watts, Sean M. and George, Melissa D. and Levey, Douglas J.},
  year = {2015},
  month = apr,
  journal = {BioScience},
  volume = {65},
  number = {4},
  pages = {397--407},
  issn = {1525-3244, 0006-3568},
  doi = {10.1093/biosci/biv006},
  abstract = {Since 1997, the National Science Foundation's (NSF) efforts to promote the Broader Impacts Criterion (BIC) have yielded mixed results. Here, we evaluate proposals to the Division of Environmental Biology (DEB) from submission through the reporting stage to assess DEB's implementation of the BIC. Our results suggest that within DEB, past principal investigators have tended to underreport broader impact activities, and past reviewers have paid them less attention than intellectual merit activities. Activities targeting broadening participation of underrepresented groups were particularly rare in all of the document types that we examined (i.e., proposals, panel summaries, and reports). In 2013, the NSF overhauled the review and reporting processes and recommended institutional links to promote the BIC. By examining both the mechanics of the Broader Impacts Criterion and the policy setting within which it has been implemented we hope to contribute to efforts to clarify the broader impacts concept and improve its effectiveness.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\HMDX9YA4\\Watts et al. - 2015 - Achieving Broader Impacts in the National Science .pdf}
}

@book{wickham2017,
  title = {R for {{Data Science}}: Import, {{Tidy}}, {{Transform}}, {{Visualize}}, and {{Model Data}}},
  shorttitle = {R for {{Data Science}}},
  author = {Wickham, Hadley and Grolemund, Garrett},
  year = {2017},
  month = jan,
  edition = {1st edition},
  publisher = {{O'Reilly Media}},
  address = {{Sebastopol, CA}},
  abstract = {Learn how to use R to turn raw data into insight, knowledge, and understanding. This book introduces you to R, RStudio, and the tidyverse, a collection of R packages designed to work together to make data science fast, fluent, and fun. Suitable for readers with no previous programming experience, R for Data Science is designed to get you doing data science as quickly as possible.Authors Hadley Wickham and Garrett Grolemund guide you through the steps of importing, wrangling, exploring, and modeling your data and communicating the results. You'll get a complete, big-picture understanding of the data science cycle, along with basic tools you need to manage the details. Each section of the book is paired with exercises to help you practice what you've learned along the way.You'll learn how to:Wrangle\textemdash transform your datasets into a form convenient for analysisProgram\textemdash learn powerful R tools for solving data problems with greater clarity and easeExplore\textemdash examine your data, generate hypotheses, and quickly test themModel\textemdash provide a low-dimensional summary that captures true "signals" in your datasetCommunicate\textemdash learn R Markdown for integrating prose, code, and results.},
  isbn = {978-1-4919-1039-9},
  langid = {english}
}

@misc{zotero-4478,
  title = {28 {{Graphics}} for Communication | {{R}} for {{Data Science}}},
  howpublished = {https://r4ds.had.co.nz/graphics-for-communication.html},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\Francisco\\Zotero\\storage\\553MKGHV\\graphics-for-communication.html}
}