@rkmaws — a number of changes landed on the IAB seller-agent and buyer-agent repos today that affect your AgentCore branches. Wanted to flag the relevant deltas and outline the path forward for both.
Seller side (rkmaws/seller-agent:feat/agentcore-adapter) — clean ask
Two things changed on seller-agent main since your branch was cut:
Could you (a) rebase against current main, (b) drop your crewai version bump line, (c) open the PR? We'll review and merge promptly. Should be a small rebase since the rest of seller-agent main hasn't moved much.
Buyer side (rkmaws/buyer-agent:feat/agentcore-adapter) — bigger rebase, plus a design question
Since your branch's last sync (May 18, based on April 27 main), buyer-agent main has absorbed 13 PRs. The notables:
- PR #82 (SafeGuard Privacy approval gate) — affects
request_deal.py, discover_inventory.py, buyer_deal_flow.py (same files your AgentCore handlers touch)
- PR #90 (CPM hallucination fix) — changes pricing flow signatures (
PricingResult.pricing_source, Optional[float] on CPMs)
- PR #91 (pluggable storage backends — SQLite/Redis/Postgres+Redis hybrid)
- PR #94 (buyer-side crewai bump to 1.14.6 — Flow API changed; needed a small
__init__ adjustment we already absorbed)
- PR #95 + #97 (lint cleanup —
ruff check and ruff format both clean now)
- Plus a few CI infrastructure fixes (#89 flask dev dep, #93 Docker, #92 + #96 cross-repo test gating)
The big one for you is still PR #82 (SafeGuard Privacy). When you rebase, your AgentCore handlers in request_deal.py / buyer_deal_flow.py / discover_inventory.py will conflict with the SGP gate code. Our read is the resolution is "keep both" — preserve SGP checks AND layer AgentCore handlers on top.
Quick design question: when your branch is diffed against current main, it appears to remove the SGP integration from buyer_deal_flow.py. We believe that's a stale-branch artifact (your branch predates SGP by a month, so it never had it), not a deliberate design decision. Can you confirm? If your AgentCore design actually requires bypassing SGP, that's a conversation we should have before the rebase.
Could you rebase against current main and surface the SGP conflict points? Happy to pair on the resolution if useful.
Buyer-agent CI is now fully green (Lint, Test, Docker), so your rebased PR will get reliable signals.
Thanks!
Aidan
@rkmaws — a number of changes landed on the IAB seller-agent and buyer-agent repos today that affect your AgentCore branches. Wanted to flag the relevant deltas and outline the path forward for both.
Seller side (
rkmaws/seller-agent:feat/agentcore-adapter) — clean askTwo things changed on seller-agent main since your branch was cut:
>=1.14.4,<2.0.0(PR Bump crewai to >=1.14.4 for parity + security (ar-r82f.12) #14, commit7e6b7d4) — so the version bump in your branch is now redundant; please drop that pyproject change when you rebase3318cd2) — unrelated to AgentCore but you'll see it on mainCould you (a) rebase against current
main, (b) drop your crewai version bump line, (c) open the PR? We'll review and merge promptly. Should be a small rebase since the rest of seller-agent main hasn't moved much.Buyer side (
rkmaws/buyer-agent:feat/agentcore-adapter) — bigger rebase, plus a design questionSince your branch's last sync (May 18, based on April 27 main), buyer-agent main has absorbed 13 PRs. The notables:
request_deal.py,discover_inventory.py,buyer_deal_flow.py(same files your AgentCore handlers touch)PricingResult.pricing_source,Optional[float]on CPMs)__init__adjustment we already absorbed)ruff checkandruff formatboth clean now)The big one for you is still PR #82 (SafeGuard Privacy). When you rebase, your AgentCore handlers in
request_deal.py/buyer_deal_flow.py/discover_inventory.pywill conflict with the SGP gate code. Our read is the resolution is "keep both" — preserve SGP checks AND layer AgentCore handlers on top.Quick design question: when your branch is diffed against current main, it appears to remove the SGP integration from
buyer_deal_flow.py. We believe that's a stale-branch artifact (your branch predates SGP by a month, so it never had it), not a deliberate design decision. Can you confirm? If your AgentCore design actually requires bypassing SGP, that's a conversation we should have before the rebase.Could you rebase against current
mainand surface the SGP conflict points? Happy to pair on the resolution if useful.Buyer-agent CI is now fully green (Lint, Test, Docker), so your rebased PR will get reliable signals.
Thanks!
Aidan