Skip to content

Collect prevalence of different OME-Zarr versions in the wild #64

@lubianat

Description

@lubianat

From "https://forum.image.sc/t/ngff-weekly-dev-update-thread/110810/81", it is reasonable to have more data to answer the question of

"how relevant (reading) support for older OME-Zarr versions still is."

Taking a look at https://ngff.openmicroscopy.org/resources/data/index.html may be good start.

That is a very good question.

BioImage Archive is generating OME-Zarr 0.4 data while 1.0 does not come out, and there is a good amount of 0.5 data out there, at least for the challenge.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentation

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions