|
| 1 | +package com.pocketnode.power |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +import org.junit.Assert.* |
| 4 | +import org.junit.Test |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +/** |
| 7 | + * Tests for startup order and critical hold patterns. |
| 8 | + * |
| 9 | + * Bug context: setRpc() was called before setMode() in BitcoindService startup. |
| 10 | + * setRpc() checks activeScope (set by setMode()) and returns early if null. |
| 11 | + * This meant burst cycling never started on cold boot — network stayed fully |
| 12 | + * open for ~15 min until a UI screen called setRpc() again. |
| 13 | + * |
| 14 | + * Fixed by swapping the order: setMode() first (sets scope), then setRpc(). |
| 15 | + */ |
| 16 | +class StartupOrderTest { |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | + // ── Startup Sequence ───────────────────────────────────────────── |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | + @Test |
| 21 | + fun `setRpc requires activeScope - returns early if null`() { |
| 22 | + // Simulates the bug: setRpc() called before setMode() |
| 23 | + var activeScope: Any? = null |
| 24 | + var burstStarted = false |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | + // setRpc logic: checks activeScope |
| 27 | + fun setRpc() { |
| 28 | + val mode = PowerModeManager.Mode.LOW |
| 29 | + val burstActive = false |
| 30 | + val initialSyncHold = false |
| 31 | + if (mode != PowerModeManager.Mode.MAX && !burstActive && !initialSyncHold) { |
| 32 | + val scope = activeScope ?: return // <-- returns early if null |
| 33 | + burstStarted = true |
| 34 | + } |
| 35 | + } |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | + setRpc() |
| 38 | + assertFalse("Burst should NOT start when activeScope is null", burstStarted) |
| 39 | + } |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | + @Test |
| 42 | + fun `setMode then setRpc - correct order starts burst`() { |
| 43 | + var activeScope: Any? = null |
| 44 | + var burstStarted = false |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | + // setMode sets the scope |
| 47 | + fun setMode() { |
| 48 | + activeScope = Object() // non-null scope |
| 49 | + } |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | + // setRpc checks the scope |
| 52 | + fun setRpc() { |
| 53 | + val mode = PowerModeManager.Mode.LOW |
| 54 | + val burstActive = false |
| 55 | + val initialSyncHold = false |
| 56 | + if (mode != PowerModeManager.Mode.MAX && !burstActive && !initialSyncHold) { |
| 57 | + val scope = activeScope ?: return |
| 58 | + burstStarted = true |
| 59 | + } |
| 60 | + } |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | + setMode() // FIRST: sets activeScope |
| 63 | + setRpc() // SECOND: checks activeScope, starts burst |
| 64 | + assertTrue("Burst SHOULD start when setMode() called first", burstStarted) |
| 65 | + } |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | + @Test |
| 68 | + fun `wrong order - setRpc then setMode - burst never starts from setRpc`() { |
| 69 | + var activeScope: Any? = null |
| 70 | + var burstStartedFromSetRpc = false |
| 71 | + var burstStartedFromSetMode = false |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | + fun setRpc() { |
| 74 | + val mode = PowerModeManager.Mode.LOW |
| 75 | + val burstActive = false |
| 76 | + val initialSyncHold = false |
| 77 | + if (mode != PowerModeManager.Mode.MAX && !burstActive && !initialSyncHold) { |
| 78 | + val scope = activeScope ?: return |
| 79 | + burstStartedFromSetRpc = true |
| 80 | + } |
| 81 | + } |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | + fun setMode() { |
| 84 | + activeScope = Object() |
| 85 | + // setMode calls applyMode which also starts burst, |
| 86 | + // but the RPC client might not be ready yet |
| 87 | + burstStartedFromSetMode = true |
| 88 | + } |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | + setRpc() // WRONG ORDER: activeScope still null |
| 91 | + setMode() // Sets scope but burst needs RPC |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | + assertFalse("setRpc should have returned early", burstStartedFromSetRpc) |
| 94 | + assertTrue("setMode starts its own burst path", burstStartedFromSetMode) |
| 95 | + } |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | + // ── Both Startup Paths ─────────────────────────────────────────── |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + @Test |
| 100 | + fun `cold start path follows correct order`() { |
| 101 | + // Verify the pattern from BitcoindService.startBitcoind() |
| 102 | + // Line 251-252 (after fix): |
| 103 | + // pmm.setMode(modeFlow.value, serviceScope) // FIRST |
| 104 | + // pmm.setRpc(rpc) // SECOND |
| 105 | + val steps = mutableListOf<String>() |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | + steps.add("start_bitcoind") |
| 108 | + steps.add("create_rpc_client") |
| 109 | + steps.add("start_monitors") |
| 110 | + steps.add("setMode") // Sets activeScope |
| 111 | + steps.add("setRpc") // Checks activeScope, starts burst |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | + val setModeIdx = steps.indexOf("setMode") |
| 114 | + val setRpcIdx = steps.indexOf("setRpc") |
| 115 | + assertTrue("setMode must come before setRpc", setModeIdx < setRpcIdx) |
| 116 | + } |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | + @Test |
| 119 | + fun `attach path follows correct order`() { |
| 120 | + // Verify the pattern from BitcoindService attach-to-running path |
| 121 | + val steps = mutableListOf<String>() |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | + steps.add("detect_running_bitcoind") |
| 124 | + steps.add("rpc_health_check") |
| 125 | + steps.add("start_monitors") |
| 126 | + steps.add("setMode") |
| 127 | + steps.add("setRpc") |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | + val setModeIdx = steps.indexOf("setMode") |
| 130 | + val setRpcIdx = steps.indexOf("setRpc") |
| 131 | + assertTrue("setMode must come before setRpc (attach path)", setModeIdx < setRpcIdx) |
| 132 | + } |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | + // ── Network Hold for Lightning Operations ──────────────────────── |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | + @Test |
| 137 | + fun `receive hold pattern - acquire before generate, release after timeout or receive`() { |
| 138 | + var holdCount = 0 |
| 139 | + var invoiceGenerated = false |
| 140 | + var paymentReceived = false |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | + // Generate invoice on non-MAX mode |
| 143 | + val mode = PowerModeManager.Mode.LOW |
| 144 | + if (mode != PowerModeManager.Mode.MAX) { |
| 145 | + holdCount++ |
| 146 | + } |
| 147 | + assertEquals("Hold acquired for receive", 1, holdCount) |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | + invoiceGenerated = true |
| 150 | + assertTrue("Invoice generated while hold active", invoiceGenerated) |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | + // Simulate payment received |
| 153 | + paymentReceived = true |
| 154 | + if (paymentReceived) { |
| 155 | + holdCount-- |
| 156 | + } |
| 157 | + assertEquals("Hold released after receive", 0, holdCount) |
| 158 | + } |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | + @Test |
| 161 | + fun `send hold pattern - acquire on screen entry, release on exit`() { |
| 162 | + var holdCount = 0 |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | + // Enter send screen |
| 165 | + val mode = PowerModeManager.Mode.LOW |
| 166 | + if (mode != PowerModeManager.Mode.MAX) { |
| 167 | + holdCount++ |
| 168 | + } |
| 169 | + assertEquals(1, holdCount) |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | + // Payment completes, screen exits |
| 172 | + holdCount-- |
| 173 | + assertEquals("Hold released on exit", 0, holdCount) |
| 174 | + } |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | + @Test |
| 177 | + fun `channel open hold pattern - acquire, wait for confirmed, release after buffer`() { |
| 178 | + var holdCount = 0 |
| 179 | + var channelReady = false |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | + // Start channel open |
| 182 | + holdCount++ |
| 183 | + assertEquals(1, holdCount) |
| 184 | + |
| 185 | + // Channel confirmed |
| 186 | + channelReady = true |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | + // 10s buffer then release |
| 189 | + if (channelReady) { |
| 190 | + holdCount-- |
| 191 | + } |
| 192 | + assertEquals("Hold released after channel ready + buffer", 0, holdCount) |
| 193 | + } |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | + @Test |
| 196 | + fun `MAX mode skips all holds`() { |
| 197 | + var holdCount = 0 |
| 198 | + val mode = PowerModeManager.Mode.MAX |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | + // Receive flow |
| 201 | + if (mode != PowerModeManager.Mode.MAX) { |
| 202 | + holdCount++ |
| 203 | + } |
| 204 | + assertEquals("MAX mode should not acquire hold", 0, holdCount) |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | + // Send flow |
| 207 | + if (mode != PowerModeManager.Mode.MAX) { |
| 208 | + holdCount++ |
| 209 | + } |
| 210 | + assertEquals("MAX mode should not acquire hold", 0, holdCount) |
| 211 | + } |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | + @Test |
| 214 | + fun `overlapping holds stack correctly`() { |
| 215 | + var holdCount = 0 |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | + // User opens receive screen (hold 1) |
| 218 | + holdCount++ |
| 219 | + assertEquals(1, holdCount) |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | + // While waiting, user also triggers channel operation (hold 2) |
| 222 | + holdCount++ |
| 223 | + assertEquals(2, holdCount) |
| 224 | + |
| 225 | + // Receive completes (release 1) |
| 226 | + holdCount-- |
| 227 | + assertEquals(1, holdCount) |
| 228 | + assertTrue("Network still held for channel op", holdCount > 0) |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | + // Channel op completes (release 2) |
| 231 | + holdCount-- |
| 232 | + assertEquals(0, holdCount) |
| 233 | + assertFalse("All holds released", holdCount > 0) |
| 234 | + } |
| 235 | + |
| 236 | + // ── HTLC Safety Margin ─────────────────────────────────────────── |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | + @Test |
| 239 | + fun `CLTV safety buffers provide adequate margin`() { |
| 240 | + // From rust-lightning channelmonitor.rs |
| 241 | + val maxBlocksForConf = 18 // ~3 hours |
| 242 | + val cltvClaimBuffer = maxBlocksForConf * 2 // 36 blocks, ~6 hours |
| 243 | + val latencyGracePeriod = 3 // ~30 minutes |
| 244 | + val htlcFailBackBuffer = cltvClaimBuffer + latencyGracePeriod // 39 blocks |
| 245 | + |
| 246 | + assertEquals(36, cltvClaimBuffer) |
| 247 | + assertEquals(39, htlcFailBackBuffer) |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | + // Burst sync worst case: 15 min interval + 2 min sync = 17 min |
| 250 | + // In blocks: ~1.7 blocks. Well within 36-block buffer. |
| 251 | + val burstIntervalMin = 15 |
| 252 | + val burstSyncTimeoutMin = 2 |
| 253 | + val worstCaseMinutes = burstIntervalMin + burstSyncTimeoutMin |
| 254 | + val worstCaseBlocks = worstCaseMinutes.toDouble() / 10 // ~10 min per block |
| 255 | + assertTrue("Burst worst case ($worstCaseBlocks blocks) within CLTV buffer ($cltvClaimBuffer blocks)", |
| 256 | + worstCaseBlocks < cltvClaimBuffer) |
| 257 | + } |
| 258 | + |
| 259 | + @Test |
| 260 | + fun `chain polling interval sufficient for HTLC safety`() { |
| 261 | + // LDK-node polls bitcoind RPC every 2 seconds |
| 262 | + val chainPollingIntervalSecs = 2 |
| 263 | + // Even if we miss a few polls, 36 blocks = ~360 minutes of buffer |
| 264 | + val cltvBufferMinutes = 36 * 10 // ~360 minutes |
| 265 | + assertTrue("2s polling is way faster than needed for $cltvBufferMinutes min buffer", |
| 266 | + chainPollingIntervalSecs < cltvBufferMinutes * 60) |
| 267 | + } |
| 268 | +} |
0 commit comments