Some of the fields are confusing whether in the name or in the possible values when enumerations.
Some clarification is required and it can be added as tooltips or with the typical icons which open a message popup like this:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/Minimalist_info_Icon.png
The descriptions for each field and possible values are in the EUCAIM D4.4 - Annex 2.
The specific motivation for this issue is because the value "annotated" in the field "type" of dataset is confusing: it can refer to annotations in the image (regions of interest, segmentations) or in the patiend (clinical data).
Some of the fields are confusing whether in the name or in the possible values when enumerations.
Some clarification is required and it can be added as tooltips or with the typical icons which open a message popup like this:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/Minimalist_info_Icon.png
The descriptions for each field and possible values are in the EUCAIM D4.4 - Annex 2.
The specific motivation for this issue is because the value "annotated" in the field "type" of dataset is confusing: it can refer to annotations in the image (regions of interest, segmentations) or in the patiend (clinical data).