-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathIndex_Slides.Rmd
More file actions
269 lines (196 loc) · 6.43 KB
/
Index_Slides.Rmd
File metadata and controls
269 lines (196 loc) · 6.43 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
---
title: "Holistic Model Building: Supporting Decisions for Risks in Agroforestry Investment"
subtitle: "The 6th World Congress on Agroforestry 2025"
author: "Denise Margaret S. Matias¹, Cory W. Whitney²"
institute: "¹Eberswalde University, Germany,<br> ²University of Bonn, Germany"
date: "Kigali, Rwanda | 20-24 October 2025"
output:
xaringan::moon_reader:
css: [default, metropolis, metropolis-fonts]
nature:
ratio: '16:9'
highlightStyle: github
highlightLines: true
countIncrementalSlides: false
---
# The Challenge: Complexity & Risk in Agroforestry
.pull-left[
### **Unique Risks in Agroforestry**
- **System Complexity**: Multiple species, longer time horizons
- **Farmer Burden**: New costs and management risks
- **Climate Vulnerability**: Compounded by climate variability in tropics
- **Limited Tools**: Poor access to risk management instruments

]
.pull-right[
### **The Insurance Gap**
**Key Challenges:**
- 🎯 Risk Perception Gaps
- 📊 Limited Impact Data
- 🔄 Complex Modeling
- 🌍 Cultural Barriers
**Critical Question**: Can insurance enhance sustainability of agroforestry investments?
]
---
# Our Transdisciplinary Approach
.pull-left[
### **Methodological Framework**
1. **Scoping Review**
- Literature analysis
- Risk assessment frameworks
- Insurance mechanisms
2. **Participatory Workshops**
- Copenhagen, Bonn, Philippines
- Indigenous communities
- Multi-stakeholder engagement
]
.pull-right[
### **Stakeholder Engagement**
**Participant Groups:**
- Indigenous Communities → Local Knowledge
- Researchers → Scientific Models
- Policy Makers → Policy Design
- Technical Experts → Implementation
**Tools Used**: Structured discussions, influence diagramming, knowledge integration

]
---
# Influence Diagram - Insurance Impacts

---
# Key Findings: Risk Perception & Reality
.pull-left[
### **The Perception Gap**
- **Significant divergence** between actual and perceived risks
- Risk perception shaped by:
- Socioeconomic factors
- Cultural context
- Environmental experience
- Influences insurance adoption decisions
]
.pull-right[
### **Workshop Insights**
**Risk Dimensions:**
- **Objective Risks**: Climate hazards, market volatility
- **Perceived Risks**: Cultural beliefs, past experiences
- **Insurance Impact**: Mediated by perception gaps

**Critical Insight**: Insurance design must account for both objective and perceived risks
]
---
# Modeling Approach: From Concept to Simulation
.pull-left[
### **Conceptual Model Development**
- Analyzes interplay between:
- Objective risks (climate, markets)
- Perceived risks (farmer perspectives)
- Identifies decision pathways
- Integrates local and scientific knowledge
]
.pull-right[
### **Digital Implementation**
**Model Specifications:**
- Simulation Type → Monte Carlo
- Iterations → 10,000
- Analysis Method → Value of Information
- Output → Opportunity costs, scenarios
**Focus**: Assess insurance scenarios and their impacts on agroforestry sustainability
]
---
# Results: Insurance Impact on Resilience
.pull-left[
### **Climate Shock Resilience**
- **Insured systems**: Higher resilience to climate shocks
- **Reduced conversion**: Lower likelihood of switching to monocultures
- **Economic stability**: Better risk management capabilities
]
.pull-right[
### **Comparative Analysis**
**System Performance:**
- Agroforestry + Insurance → High resilience, High biodiversity
- Agroforestry Only → Medium resilience, High biodiversity
- Monoculture → Low resilience, Low biodiversity
**Key Finding**: Insurance coverage correlates with sustained agroforestry practices
]
---
# Indigenous Knowledge & Cultural Dimensions
.pull-left[
### **Traditional Wisdom**
- **Cultural practices** provide risk adaptation strategies
- **Local knowledge** informs understanding of environmental risks
- **Community-based** approaches to risk management
]
.pull-right[
### **Integration Imperative**
**Traditional Elements:**
- Cultural Practices → Maintain identity
- Traditional Knowledge → Context-specific solutions
- Community Governance → Participatory design
- Local Risk Assessment → Accurate risk mapping
**Critical Insight**: Successful insurance requires blending traditional and contemporary approaches
]
---
# Biodiversity & Economic Synergies
.pull-left[
### **Conservation Incentives**
- Insurance reduces economic vulnerability
- Enables long-term biodiversity investments
- Supports complex, multi-species systems
- Promotes ecological resilience
]
.pull-right[
### **Economic-Biodiversity Links**
**Insurance Mechanisms:**
- Risk Reduction → Enables biodiversity investments
- Long-term Planning → Supports perennial systems
- Diversification Support → Encourages species richness
- Ecosystem Services → Monetizes ecological benefits
**Key Benefit**: Insurance can incentivize biodiversity conservation through economic stability
]
---
# Implementation Framework & Policy Needs
.pull-left[
### **Participatory Design Process**
- Co-development with farmers
- Cultural sensitivity
- Local context adaptation
- Traditional knowledge integration
]
.pull-right[
### **Policy Support Requirements**
**Multi-level Approach:**
- Local → Community engagement
- National → Regulatory frameworks
- International → Climate finance access
**Critical Success Factors:**
- Tailored approaches for biodiversity-rich systems
- Targeted policy support
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration
]
---
# Conclusions & Next Steps
.pull-left[
### **Key Contributions**
1. **Holistic Model**: Integrates risk perception and objective analysis
2. **Participatory Approach**: Bridges local and scientific knowledge
3. **Decision Support**: Provides tools for insurance design
4. **Sustainability Pathway**: Links insurance to biodiversity conservation
]
.pull-right[
### **Future Directions**
- Scale model to other regions
- Develop pilot insurance products
- Strengthen indigenous knowledge integration
- Policy engagement for implementation
**Data & Code Available:** https://zenodo.org/records/11051131
]
---
class: center, middle, inverse
# Thank You!
### Questions?
**Contact**: Denise Margaret S. Matias
<br>
**#WCA6 #Agroforestry2025 #RiskInsurance #SustainableInvestment**
.center[
*Bridging traditional wisdom and modern risk management for resilient agroforestry systems*
]