In workflow Build release Docker Images, there are some problems with job "docker-ymax":
The second problem is obviously the most severe, and I think would be best addressed by publishing ymax images into a new package rather than having them share agoric-sdk and updating job "deploy-ymax0-planner" and workflow deploy-ymax1-planner.yml accordingly (along with anything else as relevant). Note that job "docker-solo" already publishes into distinct package cosmic-swingset-solo, so we'd just need another one.
It would also be nice if the intended-to-be-stable tags theirselves were prefixed, e.g. "ymax-planner-20260212054536-754698" rather than just "20260212054536-754698".
In workflow Build release Docker Images, there are some problems with job "docker-ymax":
tagandtagsrefer to a nonexistent "docker-tags" step (such a step does exist in job "docker-sdk", from which "docker-ymax" was presumably copied).The second problem is obviously the most severe, and I think would be best addressed by publishing ymax images into a new package rather than having them share agoric-sdk and updating job "deploy-ymax0-planner" and workflow deploy-ymax1-planner.yml accordingly (along with anything else as relevant). Note that job "docker-solo" already publishes into distinct package cosmic-swingset-solo, so we'd just need another one.
It would also be nice if the intended-to-be-stable tags theirselves were prefixed, e.g. "ymax-planner-20260212054536-754698" rather than just "20260212054536-754698".